Inbreeding, Incest, and the Incest Taboo: The State of Knowledge at the Turn of the Century

Front Cover
Stanford University Press, 2005 - Social Science - 228 pages
Is inbreeding harmful? Are human beings and other primates naturally inclined to mate with their closest relatives? Why is incest widely prohibited? Why does the scope of the prohibition vary from society to society? Why does incest occur despite the prohibition? What are the consequences? After one hundred years of intense argument, a broad consensus has emerged on the first two questions, but the debate over the others continues.

That there is a biological basis for the avoidance of inbreeding seems incontrovertible, but just how injurious inbreeding really is for successive generations remains an open question. Nor has there been any conclusion to the debate over Freud s view that the incest taboo is necessary because humans are sexually attracted to their closest relatives--a claim countered by Westermarck's argument for the sexually inhibiting effects of early childhood association.

This book brings together contributions from the fields of genetics, behavioral biology, primatology, biological and social anthropology, philosophy, and psychiatry which reexamine these questions.

 

Contents

List of Tables and Figures
1
Inbreeding Avoidance and Incest Taboos
24
Genetic Aspects of Inbreeding and Incest
38
Inbreeding Avoidance in Primates
61
Explaining the Westermarck Effect
76
Ancient Egyptian Sibling Marriage
93
The Crucial Step
109
Assessing the Gaps in Westermarcks Theory
121
With Considerable
139
Evolutionary Thought and the Current
161
The Incest Taboo as Darwinian Natural Right
190
List of Contributors
219
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2005)

Arthur P. Wolf is David and Lucile Packard Foundation Professor of Human Biology at Stanford University. William H. Durham is Bing Professor of Human Biology at Stanford University.

Bibliographic information