The Birth of Model Theory: Löwenheim's Theorem in the Frame of the Theory of Relatives

Front Cover
Princeton University Press, Jan 10, 2009 - Mathematics - 256 pages

Löwenheim's theorem reflects a critical point in the history of mathematical logic, for it marks the birth of model theory--that is, the part of logic that concerns the relationship between formal theories and their models. However, while the original proofs of other, comparably significant theorems are well understood, this is not the case with Löwenheim's theorem. For example, the very result that scholars attribute to Löwenheim today is not the one that Skolem--a logician raised in the algebraic tradition, like Löwenheim--appears to have attributed to him. In The Birth of Model Theory, Calixto Badesa provides both the first sustained, book-length analysis of Löwenheim's proof and a detailed description of the theoretical framework--and, in particular, of the algebraic tradition--that made the theorem possible.


Badesa's three main conclusions amount to a completely new interpretation of the proof, one that sharply contradicts the core of modern scholarship on the topic. First, Löwenheim did not use an infinitary language to prove his theorem; second, the functional interpretation of Löwenheim's normal form is anachronistic, and inappropriate for reconstructing the proof; and third, Löwenheim did not aim to prove the theorem's weakest version but the stronger version Skolem attributed to him. This book will be of considerable interest to historians of logic, logicians, philosophers of logic, and philosophers of mathematics.

 

Contents

Chapter 1 Algebra of Classes and Propositional Calculus
1
Chapter 2 The Theory of Relatives
31
Chapter 3 Changing the Order of Quantifiers
73
Chapter 4 The Löwenheim Normal Form
107
Chapter 5 Preliminaries to Löwenheims Theorem
129
Chapter 6 Löwenheims Theorem
143
Appendix FirstOrder Logic with Fleeing Indices
207
References
227
Index
237
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 10 - THEY who are acquainted with the present state of the theory of Symbolical Algebra, are aware, that the validity of the processes of analysis does not depend upon the interpretation of the symbols which are employed, but solely upon the laws of their combination. Every system of interpretation which does not affect the truth of the relations supposed, is equally admissible...
Page 9 - We may in fact lay aside the logical interpretation of the symbols in the given equation; convert them into quantitative symbols, susceptible only of the values 0 and 1; perform upon them as such all the requisite processes of solution; and finally restore them to their logical interpretation.
Page 10 - Every system of interpretation which does not affect the truth of the relations supposed, is equally admissible, and it is thus that the same process may, under one scheme of interpretation, represent the solution of a question on the properties of numbers, under another, that of a geometrical problem, and under a third, that of a problem of dynamics or optics.
Page 4 - good," is employed as a term of description, let us represent by a letter, as y, all things to which the description "good" is applicable, ie "all good things," or the class "good things." Let it further be agreed, that by the combination xy shall be represented that class of things to which the names or descriptions represented by x and y are simultaneously applicable. Thus, if x alone stands for "white things," and y for "sheep," let xy stand for "white sheep;" and in like manner, if z stand for...

References to this book

Philosophy of Logic

Limited preview - 2006

About the author (2009)

Calixto Badesa is Associate Professor of Logic and History of Logic at the University of Barcelona.

Bibliographic information