What people are saying - Write a review
Other editions - View all
actively open-minded Allais paradox answer argued argument assume attributes average Baron behavior beliefs benefit better bias biases cancer cause Chapter choice choose concerned consider cooperation correlation cost decision analysis dimension discussed disease dynamic inconsistency effect emotions error evaluate evidence example expected utility expected value expected-utility theory experiment favor formula function gamble given harm heuristic hypothesis idea inference intuitions involve irrational judge Kahneman kind less logic loss means measure method moral normative model normative theory omission bias one’s option outcomes patients people’s possible predict prescriptive present primacy effect principle prior probability probability judgments probability theory problem prospect theory question rational reason representativeness heuristic result risk risk aversion rule score situation social dilemmas standard gambles subjects were asked Suppose tend things tradeoff true Tversky utilitarianism utility theory vaccine winning
From Google Scholar
Eric von Hippel - 1994 - Management Science
JW Payne, JR Bettman, EJ Johnson - 1992 - Annual Review of Psychology
Jon Elster - 1998 - Journal of Economic Literature
All Scholar search results »
Eric von Hippel - 1998 - Management Science
Boundaries of Rationality: THINKING AND DECIDING (second edition ...
- 47 - Baron, Jonathan, Thinking and Deciding , Cambridge ...
Bias and Belief wiki / Thinking and Deciding
Medical Decision Making
Thinking and Deciding
Chapter 5 Thinking = Inference + Search + Inference
Hurley S Perspectives on Imitation Nutt D Drugs and the Future ...
How can rationality be defined?
Thinking And Deciding - Boek - BESLIST.nl