Code Wars: 10 Years of P2P Software Litigation'With a combination of acute observation, close analysis and clear-headed honesty, Rebecca Giblin leads the reader to share her conclusion that there is no legislative, judicial, commercial or technical panacea for copyright infringement which P2P sof |
Contents
| 1 | |
2 Applying the preP2P law to Napster | 18 |
3 Targeted attacks on the US secondary liability law | 46 |
4 The targeted response | 74 |
5 PostGrokster fallout | 88 |
why rights holders would never have sued a P2P provider under UK or Canadian law and why the Australian law was just right | 104 |
7 The end of the road for Kazaa | 127 |
9 Can the secondary liability law respond to codes revolutionary nature? | 166 |
Notes to the text | 184 |
| 230 | |
| 253 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
9th Cir A&M Records Inc accessed actual knowledge Aimster Aimster Copyright Litigation America v Universal amounts of infringement Amstrad Arista Records Australia Pty Ltd authorization Betamax BitTorrent Inc capable of substantial CD Cal code-based Columbia Artists Management contributory infringement contributory liability copying Copyright Act copyright infringement Court held decision Digital distribution technologies District Court doctrine F 3d F Supp 2d facilitate FastTrack Fonovisa Gnutella Grokster Ltd Ibid Inc v Grokster Inc v Napster inducement internal note omitted Kazaa LimeWire ment MGM Studios Inc Music Australia Pty Napster Inc Ninth Circuit P2P file sharing P2P software providers Peer-To-Peer physical world assumptions Pirate Bay plaintiffs reasonable alternative design relevant right and ability rights holders secondary liability secondary liability law servers Sharman License Holdings Sony Corporation StreamCast substantial non-infringing supernode Tech third party infringement tort Universal City Studios Universal Music Australia users vicarious liability Zittrain