Conflicts of Law and Morality
Powerful emotion and pursuit of self-interest have many times led people to break the law with the belief that they are doing so with sound moral reasons. This study, a comprehensive philosophical and legal analysis of the gray area in which the foundations of law and morality clash, views these oblique circumstances from two perspectives: that of the person who faces a possible conflict between the claims of morality and law and must choose whether or not to obey the penal code; and that of the people who make and uphold laws and must decide whether to treat someone with a moral claim to disobey differently from ordinary lawbreakers. In examining the extent of the obligations owed by citizens to their government, Greenawalt concentrates on the possible existence of a single source of obligation that reaches all citizens and all laws. He also discusses techniques of amelioration of punishment for conscientious lawbreakers, asking how far legal systems should go to accommodate individuals who break the law for reason of conscience. Drawing from numerous examples of conflicts between law and morality, Greeawalt illustrates in detail the positions and predicaments of potential lawbreakers and lawmakers alike.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
acceptance act utilitarian action actor apply appropriate argument attitudes behavior believe benefits burdens chapter choice citizens civil disobedience compliance comply concern conscientious objectors consent consequentialist constitutional conviction defense demands deontological discussion duty of fair duty to obey enforcement evaluation exemption exist fair play favor force H. L. A. Hart harm illegal individual injustice involve J. L. Mackie judges judgment jurors jury jury nullification justice legislative legitimate liberal democracy limited ment military service Model Penal Code moral claims moral duty moral reasons moral right morally preferable morally wrong natural duty norms obedience to law obey the law obligation to obey officials one's one’s overall particular perform person political authority political order position possible principle promise to obey prosecutors punishment question Rawls Rawls's relevant religious response rule utilitarian sense share Simmons social society someone Soper standards substantial suggested supra theory tion unfair unjust laws violation warranted