Cricket and the Law: The Man in White is Always RightThis is a revised edition of a quirky text which was first published by a small Australian publishing house, and which has been extremely positively reviewed. |
Contents
1 Introduction | 1 |
2 The legal theory of cricket | 14 |
3 Lord Denning cricket law and the meaning of life | 20 |
4 Dante cricket law and the meaning of life | 24 |
5 Laws not rules or cricket as adjudication | 28 |
6 Law codes and the spirit of the game | 37 |
7 More law and the spirit of the game | 48 |
umpires judges and the rule of law | 64 |
terror and the rule of law in cricket | 186 |
18 Balltampering and the rule of law | 200 |
19 The little master balltampering and the rule of law | 238 |
temporality and the meaning of cricket | 247 |
21 Ethical discourse legal narrative and the meaning of cricket | 255 |
22 Yousledging and cricket as ethical discourse | 258 |
23 Walking the judicial function and the meaning of law | 273 |
24 Other stories about cricket law and the meaning of life | 282 |
9 Umpires decisions and the rule of law | 78 |
10 The man in white is always right but he is not always neutral | 99 |
11 Technology adjudication and law | 104 |
12 Leg before wicket causation and the rule of law | 116 |
13 Mankad Javed Hilditch Sarfraz and the rule of law | 124 |
underarm bowling legality and the meaning of life | 138 |
15 The chucker as outlawlegality morality and exclusion in cricket | 145 |
16 Murali Shoaib and the jurisprudence of chucking | 152 |