The Recovered Memory/false Memory Debate
Kathy Pezdek, William P. Banks
Academic Press, 1996 - Psychology - 394 pages
A debate has been raging in courtrooms, journals, and the popular press about the validity of recovered memories. The memories in question are of childhood sexual abuse, mistreatment, and trauma. They have tremendous power for harm or healing, for righting of wrongs or for unjust accusations; it all depends on their validity. Is it possible for a memory to be lost and then "recovered?" What is the validity of such a memory? Can children be persuaded that events did or did not happen? What causes childhood amnesia and are traumatic childhood memories more or less likely to be remembered than nontraumatic ones? This book examines these and other complex but critical questions. It presents the latest contributions from researchers representing the full range of positions on the issues and using many different approaches to the questions.The topics are organized as follows. Section I covers the effects of emotion and stress on memory in children. Section II contains analyses of the development of normal autobiographical memory as a context for understanding how childhood traumatic events might be recalled, whether at the time by children, or later by adults. Section III covers the suggestibility of memory. This issue is central because therapists may unwittingly induce false memories in their patients, and abusers may suggest to their victims that their memories are imaginary. Whether and how these can happen depends on suggestibility. The veracity of child witnesses also hinges to a great degree on their suggestibility. Section IV contains some examples from current literature and is the only place where the reports on recovered memories from both the American and the British Psychological Associations can be found.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Predictors of Accurate and Inaccurate Memories of Traumatic Events
Amnesia Partial Amnesia and Delayed Recall among Adult Survivors
Comparing Amnesic and Nonamnesic Survivors of Childhood Sexual
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
accurate actually adults American amnesia amnesics asked associated autobiographical memory believe child childhood childhood sexual abuse children's memory claims clients clinical cognitive concerning context correct debate delayed discussed early effects emergence emotional evidence examine example experience experienced experimenter fact false memories findings forgetting functional Goodman happened important included indicated individuals influence interpretation interview involved issues Journal knowledge later lead less Loftus mean misleading months mother narrative nature observed occurred parents past patients period position possible present procedure Psychology questions recall recent recovered memories recovery remember repeated reported representation repressed response sexual abuse significant social specific story stress subjects suggestibility symptoms talk therapists therapy tion trauma traumatic events treatment true understanding VCUG victims women York