Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 84
Page 73
Table 2 – Seismic Risk Category , SRC - Exposure Category Site Seismic Zone L3 L2 L1 0 4 4 4 1 3 3 2 RELIABILITY - BASED DESIGN A strict reliability - based approach was followed in developing the ISO seismic design guidelines .
Table 2 – Seismic Risk Category , SRC - Exposure Category Site Seismic Zone L3 L2 L1 0 4 4 4 1 3 3 2 RELIABILITY - BASED DESIGN A strict reliability - based approach was followed in developing the ISO seismic design guidelines .
Page 74
The return periods listed in Table 5 are related to Exposure Category and were subjectively selected by ISO Panel 5 to guard against the risk of economic losses due to earthquakes . SIMPLIFIED AND DETAILED SEISMIC - ACTION PROCEDURES In ...
The return periods listed in Table 5 are related to Exposure Category and were subjectively selected by ISO Panel 5 to guard against the risk of economic losses due to earthquakes . SIMPLIFIED AND DETAILED SEISMIC - ACTION PROCEDURES In ...
Page 75
As Table 7 shows , the range of scale factors ( Factor 1 x Factor 2 ) calculated for L3 platforms is 0.67-0.96 . For L2 platforms , the range of scale factors is 1.10-1.20 , i.e. , this is the range of Factor 2 in Table 7 since the ...
As Table 7 shows , the range of scale factors ( Factor 1 x Factor 2 ) calculated for L3 platforms is 0.67-0.96 . For L2 platforms , the range of scale factors is 1.10-1.20 , i.e. , this is the range of Factor 2 in Table 7 since the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acceptable analysis applied approach assessment associated assumed calculated coefficient combined components considered corresponding corrosion cost crack criteria damage dependent depth determined developed directional distribution dynamic effect element Engineering environmental equation estimate evaluated example expected expressed extreme factor failure fatigue Figure force frequency function fuzzy given important increase initial inspection limit load loss maintenance marine maximum mean measures Mechanics method motion normal observed obtained offshore operations parameters peak performed period pipe pipeline platform possible prediction present probability procedure production random range relative reliability represented response return period riser risk safety ship shown shows significant simulation spectral spectrum statistical steel storm strength stress structure surface Table theory typical uncertainty variables wave height wind