## Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 25

Page 247

Stokes V * Taylor 2nd NewWavo 8 10 12 14

= 42 m Stream IV Stokes V Taylor 2nd NewWave 2 6 8 10 12 14

velocity ( m / s ) 3b Depth = 70 m Stream III Stokes V Taylor 2nd • New Wave 2 6

8 10 ...

Stokes V * Taylor 2nd NewWavo 8 10 12 14

**Horizontal**velocity ( m / s ) 3a Depth= 42 m Stream IV Stokes V Taylor 2nd NewWave 2 6 8 10 12 14

**Horizontal**velocity ( m / s ) 3b Depth = 70 m Stream III Stokes V Taylor 2nd • New Wave 2 6

8 10 ...

Page 273

The uncertainty associated to local geology and soil conditions were taken to be

0.5 , this one corresponds to seismic environment ( standard deviation of the

logarithm of G , peak

...

The uncertainty associated to local geology and soil conditions were taken to be

0.5 , this one corresponds to seismic environment ( standard deviation of the

logarithm of G , peak

**horizontal**acceleration ground motion ) was evaluated to be...

Page 364

That is , when the element ends up to some specified number pq , e.g. , element

ends ni , 53 , Saq have failed and the total structure stiffness matrix K ) satisfies

the following condition , structureal failure results :

That is , when the element ends up to some specified number pq , e.g. , element

ends ni , 53 , Saq have failed and the total structure stiffness matrix K ) satisfies

the following condition , structureal failure results :

**Horizontal**brace 1 0.610 , 19 ...### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

acceptable analysis applied approach assessment associated assumed calculated coefficient combined components considered corresponding corrosion cost crack criteria damage dependent depth determined developed directional distribution dynamic effect element Engineering environmental equation estimate evaluated example expressed extreme factor failure fatigue Figure force frequency function fuzzy given important increase initial inspection limit load loss maintenance marine maximum mean measures Mechanics method motion normal observed obtained offshore operations parameters peak performed period pipe pipeline platform possible prediction present probability procedure production random range relative reliability represented response return period riser risk safety ship shown shows significant simulation spectral spectrum statistical steel storm strength stress structure surface Table theory typical uncertainty variables wave height wind