Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 130
8 In ( ln ( N ) ) Figure 5 Variation in area with changing value of return period of
failure , for monopod C , at fixed values of fi This case is applicable to monopods
B and C . Results for this expression are shown in figure 3 , applying the equation
...
8 In ( ln ( N ) ) Figure 5 Variation in area with changing value of return period of
failure , for monopod C , at fixed values of fi This case is applicable to monopods
B and C . Results for this expression are shown in figure 3 , applying the equation
...
Page 185
It is shown that this effect may lead to a substantial shift in the resulting
predictions of long return period extreme values for specific types of estimators
combined with the POT method . A brief discussion of the implication for the
estimation of ...
It is shown that this effect may lead to a substantial shift in the resulting
predictions of long return period extreme values for specific types of estimators
combined with the POT method . A brief discussion of the implication for the
estimation of ...
Page 388
In the figure , the maximum response measured in degrees is shown to the left ,
and the dynamic amplification factor ( i . e . max dynamic angle divided by the
static angle ) to the right . Results for the top angle are shown in Figure 4 , and for
...
In the figure , the maximum response measured in degrees is shown to the left ,
and the dynamic amplification factor ( i . e . max dynamic angle divided by the
static angle ) to the right . Results for the top angle are shown in Figure 4 , and for
...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acceptable analysis applied approach assessment associated assumed calculated coefficient combined components considered corresponding corrosion cost crack criteria damage dependent depth determined developed directional distribution dynamic effect element Engineering environmental equation estimate evaluated example expressed extreme factor failure fatigue Figure force frequency function fuzzy given growth important increase initial inspection limit load loss maintenance marine maximum mean measures Mechanics method motion normal observed obtained offshore operations parameters peak performed period pipe pipeline platform possible prediction present probability procedure production random range relative reliability represented response return period riser risk safety ship shown shows significant simulation spectral spectrum statistical storm strength stress structure surface Table theory typical uncertainty variables wave height wind