Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 83
Page 195
The largest values of the describes well the long term stress range distribution assuming a extreme stress distribution are assumed to follow a Gumbel narrow banded process , with the m'th moment of the stress range distribution . equal ...
The largest values of the describes well the long term stress range distribution assuming a extreme stress distribution are assumed to follow a Gumbel narrow banded process , with the m'th moment of the stress range distribution . equal ...
Page 379
1.50_1500E3_150_10 O Probability Density for stress . 1.30_1500E3_150_10 - -200 0.8 400 0.6 Depth ( m ] -600 0.4 -800 0.2 ليلي 2 70 10 20 30 40 50 60 Stress ( MPa ) Figure 6 Probability density of impact stress .
1.50_1500E3_150_10 O Probability Density for stress . 1.30_1500E3_150_10 - -200 0.8 400 0.6 Depth ( m ] -600 0.4 -800 0.2 ليلي 2 70 10 20 30 40 50 60 Stress ( MPa ) Figure 6 Probability density of impact stress .
Page 436
The stress intensity factor is given by the following equation : ΔK = Δσ Υ ( a ) π.a ( 1 ) ( 2 ) where so is the stress range and t is time . In the evaluation of the dynamic stress range levels , both the global ( 10m ) and local ( 10 ...
The stress intensity factor is given by the following equation : ΔK = Δσ Υ ( a ) π.a ( 1 ) ( 2 ) where so is the stress range and t is time . In the evaluation of the dynamic stress range levels , both the global ( 10m ) and local ( 10 ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acceptable analysis applied approach assessment associated assumed calculated coefficient combined components considered corresponding corrosion cost crack criteria damage dependent depth determined developed directional distribution dynamic effect element Engineering environmental equation estimate evaluated example expected expressed extreme factor failure fatigue Figure force frequency function fuzzy given important increase initial inspection limit load loss maintenance marine maximum mean measures Mechanics method motion normal observed obtained offshore operations parameters peak performed period pipe pipeline platform possible prediction present probability procedure production random range relative reliability represented response return period riser risk safety ship shown shows significant simulation spectral spectrum statistical steel storm strength stress structure surface Table theory typical uncertainty variables wave height wind