« PreviousContinue »
HE whole Nation is at present very inquisitive after the proceedings in the cause of Goodman Fact, Plaintiff, and Count Tariff, Defendant; as it was tried on the 18th of June, in the
thirteenth year of her Majesty's reign, and in the year of the Lord 1713. I shall therefore give my Countrymen a short and faithful account of that whole matter. And in order to it, must in the first place premise some particulars re. lating to the person and character of the said Plaintiff Goodman Fait.
Goodman Faet is allowed by every body to be a plain-spoken person, and a man of very few words. Tropes and figures are his Averfion. He affirms every thing roundly, without any art, rhetoric, or circumlocution. He is a declared ene. my to all kinds of ceremony and complaisance. He flatters no body. Yet so great is his natural eloquence that he cuts down the finest orator, and destroys the best contrived argument, as soon as ever he gets himself to be heard. He never applies to the passions or prejudices of his audience: when they listen with attention and honeft minds, he never fails of carrying his point. He appeared in a fuit of English broad.cloth, very plain, but rich. Every thing he wore was substantial, honeft, homespun ware. His cane indeed came from the EastIndies, and two or three little fuperfluities from Turkey, and other parts. It is said that he encouraged himself with a bottle of neat Port, before he appeared at the trial. He was huzzaed into the Court by several thousands of Weavers, Clothiers, Fullers, Dyers, Packers, Calenders, Setters, Silk-men, Spinners, Dressers, Whitfters, Winders, Mercers, Throwfters, Sugar-bakers, Difillers, Drapers, Hosiers, Planters, Merchants, and Fishermen; who all unanimoufly declared that they could not live above two months longer, if their Friend Faet did not gain his cause.
Every body was over.joyed to hear that the good man was come to town. He no sooner made his appearance in Court, but several of his Friends fell a weeping at the sight of him: for indeed he had not been seen there three
before. The Charge he exhibited against Count Tarif was drawn up in the following articles.
1. That the said Count had given in false and fraudulent reports in the name of the plaintiff.
II. That the said Count had tampered with the said Plaintiff, and made use of many indirect methods to bring him over to his party:
III. That the said Count had wilfully and know. ingly traduced the said Plaintiff, having misrepresented him in many cunningly devised speeches, as a person in the French Interest.
IV. That the faid Count had averred in the presence of above five hundred persons, that he had heard the Plaintiff speak in derogation of the Portuguese, Spaniards, İtalians, Hollanders, and others; who were the persons whom the faid Plaintiff had always favoured in his discourse, and whom he should always continue to favour.
V. That the said Count had given a very disadvantageous relation of the three great Farms, which had long Aourished under the care and superintendency of the Plaintiff.
VI. That he would have obliged the owners of the said farms to buy up many commodities which grew upon their own lands. That he would have taken away the labour from the tenants, and put it into the hands of strangers. That he would have leflened and destroyed the produce of the said farms.
That by these and many other wicked devices he would have starved many honeft day-labourers; have impoverished the owner, and have filled his farm with beggars, C.
VII. That the said Count "had either sunk or mislaid several books, papers, and receipts, by which the Plaintiff might sooner have found means to vindicate himself from such calumnies, afperfi. ons, and misrepresentations.
In all these particulars Goodman Fact was very short but pithy : for, as I said before, he was a plain
home-spun man. His yea was yea, and his nay, nay. He had farther fo much of the Quaker in him, that he never swore, but his affirmation was as valid as another's oath.
It was observed that Count Tariff endeavoured to brow-beat the Plaintiff all the while he was speaking: but though he was not so impudent as the Count, he was every whit as sturdy ; and when it came tc the Count's turn to speak, old Faet so stared him in the face, after his plain, downright way, that the Count was very often struck dumb, and forced to hold his tongue in the middle of his difcourse.
More witnesses appeared on this occasion to attest Goodman Faet's veracity than ever were seen in a court of justice. His cause was pleaded by the ableft men in the kingdom; among whom was a Gentleman of Suffolk, who did him signal Service.
Count Tarif appear'd just the reverse of Goodman Fa&t. He was dressed in a fine brocade wastecoat, curiously embroidered with Flower-deluces. He wore also a broad-brimmed hat, a shoulder-knot, and a pair of silver clocked stockings. His fpeeches were accompanied with much gesture and grimace. He abounded in empty phrases, superficial flourishes, violent assertions, and feeble proofs. To be brief, he had all the French affurance, cunning, and volubility of tongue ; and would most certainly have carried' his cause, had he dealt with any one antagonist in the world besides Goodman Fact.
The Count being call’d upon to answer to the charge which had been made against him, did it after a manner peculiar to the family of the Tariffs, viz. by railing and calling names.