Rural Nursing, Volume 1Delivering health care to rural populations in comparison to urban populations requires unique considerations due to the geographic, social and cultural differences that must be taken into consideration. These volumes provide a basis for anticipating issues and options confronting rural nurses in the future. The first volume discusses background and theory necessary for the study of rural nursing and vulnerable rural populations such as pregnant women, heart patients and people with AIDS. Addressing a wide range of concerns of interest to rural nurses, Rural Nursing makes a much-needed contribution to the literature of the field. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 29
Page 50
Nowack's (1986; Nowack & Hanson, 1983) research also evaluated hardiness in
relation to psychological distress and daily problems and found support for the
stress-buffering effects of hardiness. Weibe and McCallum (1986) conducted a ...
Nowack's (1986; Nowack & Hanson, 1983) research also evaluated hardiness in
relation to psychological distress and daily problems and found support for the
stress-buffering effects of hardiness. Weibe and McCallum (1986) conducted a ...
Page 51
patients who were high in hardiness remained active and adjusted well to their
illness. However, in this study the differential effects of rurality and hardiness
could not be evaluated. Bigbee (1985) also addressed the concept of hardiness,
...
patients who were high in hardiness remained active and adjusted well to their
illness. However, in this study the differential effects of rurality and hardiness
could not be evaluated. Bigbee (1985) also addressed the concept of hardiness,
...
Page 53
Also use of standardized composite hardiness scores, based on combined
subscalez scores, makes it impossible to compare various populations and
interpret results across studies (Hull et al., 1987). In assessing the validity of
Kobasa's ...
Also use of standardized composite hardiness scores, based on combined
subscalez scores, makes it impossible to compare various populations and
interpret results across studies (Hull et al., 1987). In assessing the validity of
Kobasa's ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Background Definitions Theory | 1 |
A Review of the Literature | 7 |
The Theory and Research Base for Rural Nursing Practice | 21 |
Copyright | |
24 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
activities adolescents agricultural assessment associated attitudes body mass index cardiovascular disease Center cholesterol clients clinical concept contraceptive coping cultural delivery diabetes differences disease effects elders environment ethical evaluation factors farm females hardiness health education health problems health professionals health services health status health-promotion health-related homeless Hoosierville hospital hypertension identified illness Indian individuals interactions interview Journal Kobasa life-style living males mass media medicine migrant Montana State University Mvskoke Native American North Dakota Nursing Research nursing theory older rural women participants patients perinatal persons perspective physicians practitioners pregnancy preterm labor psychological questionnaire rates relationship reported residents responses risk rural areas rural communities rural families rural health rural nursing rural populations Ruth Meiers sample self-care sex role significant smoking cessation social support stress stressors suicide tion tocolysis University urban versus Weinert woman workers