Resilience Engineering Perspectives: Remaining sensitive to the possibility of failureErik Hollnagel, Christopher P. Nemeth, Sidney Dekker In the resilience engineering approach to safety, failures and successes are seen as two different outcomes of the same underlying process. This collection deals with issues such as measurements and models, the use of procedures to ensure safety, the relation between resilience and robustness, safety management, and the use of risk analysis. |
Contents
THE BIRTH OF | 3 |
THE NEED FOR TRANSLATORS AND FOR | 11 |
MEASURES OF RESILIENT PERFORMANCE | 29 |
UNEXAMPLED EVENTS RESILIENCE AND PRA | 49 |
SAFETY MANAGEMENT LOOKING BACK | 63 |
WHEN RESILIENCE DOES NOT WORK | 79 |
RULES MANAGEMENT AS SOURCE FOR LOOSE | 91 |
A | 101 |
APPENDIX | 190 |
RESILIENCE IN THE EMERGENCY | 193 |
A RESILIENCE | 211 |
WHAT WENT WRONG AT THE BEATSON | 225 |
RESILIENCE SAFETY AND TESTING | 237 |
DOES | 247 |
A Model of Crosschecking in a Collaborative | 254 |
ANALYSIS OF THE SCOTTISH CASE | 269 |
CREW RESILIENCE AND SIMULATOR TRAINING | 119 |
UNDERLYING CONCEPTS IN ROBUSTNESS | 127 |
STRESSSTRAIN PLOTS AS A BASIS | 143 |
DESIGNING RESILIENT CRITICAL | 159 |
List of Contributors | 299 |
325 | |
331 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ability accident action activity actual adaptive addition agents analysis approach assessment become behaviour capacity cause Chapter checking communication complex consequences consider continue critical culture decision defined demands described descriptions discussed dose effects emergency engineering environment error example expected experience factors failure Figure function future given happen human identified important incident increase indicators individual involved issue knowledge lead learning limited look means measures methods nature necessary normal observed occur Oncology operations organisation organization particular patients performance planner possible practice prescriptions present principle problem procedures question radiation reference region regulation represents requires resilience response result risk rules safe safety safety management shows situation social space staff technical treatment plan understanding unit various