Acrested 9/24/84 い Mr. M. J. Lawrence, Manager Richland, Washington 99352 Dear Mr. Lawrence: SEP 17 1984 FY 1984 NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH ORDER NO. 60-84-252 FOR PACIFIC Please authorize Pacific Northwest Laboratory to execute the program If this meets with your approval, it is requested that acceptance be (1) Evaluate existing nuclear power station performance data for their utility as intermediate (before the event) or final (after the event) measures of safety. Existing data sources identified during earlier RES (this FIN) and NRR research (FIN B2360) will be included, as a minimum, in this analysis. (2) Validate intermediate measures of safety performance identified during Task (1), using final measures as criteria. The data sample used for this validation will not be the same as that used for Task 1. Data used for this task wiTT represent intermediate and final measures covering at least 1-year period of power station performance. Data on intermediate measures will represent power station performance of approximately a 1-year period preceding those data representing final measures. TOTAL OF ORDERS PLACED PRIOR TO THIS DATE WITH THE PERFORMING ORGANIZATION DADLA UNIBER 60-84-252 DATE D AMOUNT INCLUDED IN "C" APPLICABLE TO THE "FIN NUMBER" CITED IN THIS ORDER. FINANCIAL FLEXIBILITY: n/a -0 FUNDS WILL NOT BE REPROGRAMMED BETWEEN FINS. LINE D CONSTITUTES A LIMITATION ON OBLIGATIONS FUNDS MAY BE REPROGRAMMED NOT TO EXCEED 2 10% OF FIN LEVEL UP TOSSOK LINE C CONSTITUTES A LIMITATION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS PROVIDED DOE ARE CONSIDERED PART OF THIS ORDER REMARKS: Adjust FY83 uncosted funds for the following FINS: Funds from this adjustment will be used to complete work SIGNATURE surdick If for TITLE Division of Risk Analysis & Operations MRC FORM 173 12-78) SIGNATURE ACCEPTING ORGANIZATION Maynard Sakuto PNL Operations Branch. Energy Programs Division DATE Subject: Purpose: Background: Discussion: Executive Director for Operations ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING FINAL PROPOSED FITNESS This paper responds to a December 12, 1983 memorandum from the A majority of the Commission has agreed that the rule ESCORTED ACCESS VERSUS DENIAL OF ACCESS FOR NRC EMPLOYEES The Commission agreed that the rule should apply to NRC and other Federal, State and local government employees who are authorized access to vital areas of nuclear power units, but requested CONTACT: Thomas G. Ryan, RES staff views on the issue of handling NRC employees and other A BROADLY-WORDED, PROCEDURES-BASED RULE VERSUS ONE WHICH IS MORE The Commission is concerned about whether licensees will be able We continue to believe, though, that the rule should be broadly |