## Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volumes 1-2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1990 - Arctic regions |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 39

Page 73

It is indicated that in certain region of KC number , the influenoe of

resultant force can not be ignored . f = { co poku , + V ) lu , + U1 + C P 0 ? u . ( 1 )

where uy is the wave horizontal particle velocity component , U is the current ...

It is indicated that in certain region of KC number , the influenoe of

**lift force**onresultant force can not be ignored . f = { co poku , + V ) lu , + U1 + C P 0 ? u . ( 1 )

where uy is the wave horizontal particle velocity component , U is the current ...

Page 75

So the maximum resultant force must be represented by Fra / F . a

Coefficient Cl and Its Main Frequency Based on Eq . 3 and the statistical

calculation of

be obtained .

So the maximum resultant force must be represented by Fra / F . a

**Lift Force**Coefficient Cl and Its Main Frequency Based on Eq . 3 and the statistical

calculation of

**lift force**, various**lift force**coefficients Chi Chizo and CL1 / 10 canbe obtained .

Page 76

is in this region

coefficient Cd . on The comparison of the relationship between both Co , Ca and

KC is shown in Fig . 13. When KC > 30 , the difference between C : and Ca is ...

is in this region

**lift force**is not important and C , value very close to the drag forcecoefficient Cd . on The comparison of the relationship between both Co , Ca and

KC is shown in Fig . 13. When KC > 30 , the difference between C : and Ca is ...

### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

Simulation of Hurricane Seas in a Multidirectional Wave Basin | 17 |

HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES | 47 |

The Force Coefficients on Inclined Cylinder in Random Wave and Current | 57 |

Copyright | |

45 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

acting added mass amplitude analysis applied array assumed body boundary calculated circular coefficient compared comparison component considered constant corresponding crest cylinder damping defined dependent depth determined direction distribution domain drag drift dynamic effect element elevation Engineering equation estimated experimental experiments expressed Figure flow fluid forward speed frequency function given heave horizontal hydrodynamic increase integral irregular length lift force linear load maximum mean measured method mooring motion nonlinear obtained Offshore oscillation parameters period phase pile plate potential predicted present pressure problem radiation range ratio reference regular waves relative respectively response riser second-order ship shown shown in Fig simulation solution spectra spectrum structure surface surge Table theory velocity vertical vessel wave force wave height wind