EUI Working Paper: SPS, Issues 90-95European University Institute, 1990 - Europe |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 3
Page 7
To achieve cabinet support also increases the probability of the bill passing successfully through subsequent stages of the process . Conversely , the presence of obstacles renders the adoption of already controversial policies even ...
To achieve cabinet support also increases the probability of the bill passing successfully through subsequent stages of the process . Conversely , the presence of obstacles renders the adoption of already controversial policies even ...
Page 14
... constraints are not considered ) : Compact Majority Policies General X Ideologically Divisive X Divisive X Regulatory - specific X Distributive X High Low Probability of Success X X X X Conclusions The " predictions " derived 14.
... constraints are not considered ) : Compact Majority Policies General X Ideologically Divisive X Divisive X Regulatory - specific X Distributive X High Low Probability of Success X X X X Conclusions The " predictions " derived 14.
Page 15
Composite Majority Policies General X Ideologically Divisive X Divisive X Regulatory - specific Distributive High Low Probability of Success Consociational Majority Policies General X Ideologically Divisive Divisive x Regulatory ...
Composite Majority Policies General X Ideologically Divisive X Divisive X Regulatory - specific Distributive High Low Probability of Success Consociational Majority Policies General X Ideologically Divisive Divisive x Regulatory ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
according adoption agenda allocated allow Analysis avoid become benefits Blondel cabinet choice coalition committees competence complex composite concentrated benefits concentrated costs concerning Consequences consider controversial conversely debate decision-making decisions depends difficulty diffused discussion distributive policies divisive policies Economics effective electoral EUI Working Paper European European University Institute example favour formal gain given groups HAMMOND ideologically divisive ideologically divisive policies impact imply individual influential inside the cabinet instance interests issues Italy kinds of policy least Legislative losers majority Market measures ministers obstacles organized Padova party Peter policy outputs policy-making political position possible potential Power preferences prime principle Probability problems proposals Public Policy pure Reform regulatory regulatory-specific rules Science seen sense situation Social Solution specific SPINA Structures Studies style substantive success tend Theory transformed types of policy typology variable Wilson
Bibliographic information
| Title | EUI Working Paper: SPS, Issues 90-95 EUI Working Paper: SPS, European University Institute. Department of Political and Social Sciences |
| Contributor | European University Institute. Department of Political and Social Sciences |
| Publisher | European University Institute, 1990 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |