EUI Working Paper: SPS, Issues 90-95European University Institute, 1990 - Europe |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 3
Page 2
Indeed , one of the arguments in favour of the reform could be that the present features of the cabinet are deemed inadequate , or not sufficiently adequate , to favour desired policies ( e . g . legislation or administrative measures ...
Indeed , one of the arguments in favour of the reform could be that the present features of the cabinet are deemed inadequate , or not sufficiently adequate , to favour desired policies ( e . g . legislation or administrative measures ...
Page 10
250 ff .; C. Seymour - Ure , The Disintegration of the Cabinet and the Neglected Issue of Cabinet Reform , " Parliamentary Affairs " , XXIV , 1971 , pp . 196-207 ; J.P. Mackintosh , The British Cabinet , London , Stevens , 1977 , pp .
250 ff .; C. Seymour - Ure , The Disintegration of the Cabinet and the Neglected Issue of Cabinet Reform , " Parliamentary Affairs " , XXIV , 1971 , pp . 196-207 ; J.P. Mackintosh , The British Cabinet , London , Stevens , 1977 , pp .
Page 13
The government program will be extensive , will include some " major reforms " , will be rich in declarations of principle and intent , but more vague in terms of policy choices . It is not directly legitimized by electoral support ...
The government program will be extensive , will include some " major reforms " , will be rich in declarations of principle and intent , but more vague in terms of policy choices . It is not directly legitimized by electoral support ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
according adoption agenda allocated allow Analysis avoid become benefits Blondel cabinet choice coalition committees competence complex composite concentrated benefits concentrated costs concerning Consequences consider controversial conversely debate decision-making decisions depends difficulty diffused discussion distributive policies divisive policies Economics effective electoral EUI Working Paper European European University Institute example favour formal gain given groups HAMMOND ideologically divisive ideologically divisive policies impact imply individual influential inside the cabinet instance interests issues Italy kinds of policy least Legislative losers majority Market measures ministers obstacles organized Padova party Peter policy outputs policy-making political position possible potential Power preferences prime principle Probability problems proposals Public Policy pure Reform regulatory regulatory-specific rules Science seen sense situation Social Solution specific SPINA Structures Studies style substantive success tend Theory transformed types of policy typology variable Wilson
Bibliographic information
| Title | EUI Working Paper: SPS, Issues 90-95 EUI Working Paper: SPS, European University Institute. Department of Political and Social Sciences |
| Contributor | European University Institute. Department of Political and Social Sciences |
| Publisher | European University Institute, 1990 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |