EUI Working Paper: SPS, Issues 90-95European University Institute, 1990 - Europe |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 4
Page 7
If we consider cabinet policy - making , we can now decompose it in conformity with types of policy pursued . This could enable us , among other things , to be slightly more precise about which decision - making mode or style ( e . g ...
If we consider cabinet policy - making , we can now decompose it in conformity with types of policy pursued . This could enable us , among other things , to be slightly more precise about which decision - making mode or style ( e . g ...
Page 8
We then have to consider in more detail the cabinet's characteristics and their impact on the policy process . This will be done by distinguishing three sets : those concerning the way a cabinet works ; those concerning the individual ...
We then have to consider in more detail the cabinet's characteristics and their impact on the policy process . This will be done by distinguishing three sets : those concerning the way a cabinet works ; those concerning the individual ...
Page 16
If we consider what appears to be the most relevant variable , the supporting majority ( whose impact could be modified in part by some of the other variables ) , we see that the performances of the three types of majority should differ ...
If we consider what appears to be the most relevant variable , the supporting majority ( whose impact could be modified in part by some of the other variables ) , we see that the performances of the three types of majority should differ ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
according adoption agenda allocated allow Analysis avoid become benefits Blondel cabinet choice coalition committees competence complex composite concentrated benefits concentrated costs concerning Consequences consider controversial conversely debate decision-making decisions depends difficulty diffused discussion distributive policies divisive policies Economics effective electoral EUI Working Paper European European University Institute example favour formal gain given groups HAMMOND ideologically divisive ideologically divisive policies impact imply individual influential inside the cabinet instance interests issues Italy kinds of policy least Legislative losers majority Market measures ministers obstacles organized Padova party Peter policy outputs policy-making political position possible potential Power preferences prime principle Probability problems proposals Public Policy pure Reform regulatory regulatory-specific rules Science seen sense situation Social Solution specific SPINA Structures Studies style substantive success tend Theory transformed types of policy typology variable Wilson
Bibliographic information
| Title | EUI Working Paper: SPS, Issues 90-95 EUI Working Paper: SPS, European University Institute. Department of Political and Social Sciences |
| Contributor | European University Institute. Department of Political and Social Sciences |
| Publisher | European University Institute, 1990 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |