EUI Working Paper: SPS, Issues 90-95European University Institute, 1990 - Europe |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 13
Page 4
It is understandable , then , that such policies imply strong conflict and painful decisions . ... This kind of policy , then , could be postponed sine die ( non - decision ) ; or could be delegated to agencies with no political ...
It is understandable , then , that such policies imply strong conflict and painful decisions . ... This kind of policy , then , could be postponed sine die ( non - decision ) ; or could be delegated to agencies with no political ...
Page 7
It may be said to allow a formal analysis of decision - making processes ( those which take place in cabinets , in our case ) , because they are examined in accordance with certain properties they possess , irrespective of the content ...
It may be said to allow a formal analysis of decision - making processes ( those which take place in cabinets , in our case ) , because they are examined in accordance with certain properties they possess , irrespective of the content ...
Page 8
... requirement of a formal vote , decision rule in case of conflict , e.g. unanimity , simple majority , etc. ... to go through routine decisions , that is decisions which are formally approved , but not really debated by them .
... requirement of a formal vote , decision rule in case of conflict , e.g. unanimity , simple majority , etc. ... to go through routine decisions , that is decisions which are formally approved , but not really debated by them .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
according adoption agenda allocated allow Analysis avoid become benefits Blondel cabinet choice coalition committees competence complex composite concentrated benefits concentrated costs concerning Consequences consider controversial conversely debate decision-making decisions depends difficulty diffused discussion distributive policies divisive policies Economics effective electoral EUI Working Paper European European University Institute example favour formal gain given groups HAMMOND ideologically divisive ideologically divisive policies impact imply individual influential inside the cabinet instance interests issues Italy kinds of policy least Legislative losers majority Market measures ministers obstacles organized Padova party Peter policy outputs policy-making political position possible potential Power preferences prime principle Probability problems proposals Public Policy pure Reform regulatory regulatory-specific rules Science seen sense situation Social Solution specific SPINA Structures Studies style substantive success tend Theory transformed types of policy typology variable Wilson