EUI Working Paper: SPS, Issues 90-95European University Institute, 1990 - Europe |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 4
Page 5
... is supposed to be the natural advocate of one of the two conflicting positions . This has relevant consequences for the policy's chances of success . " Pure " divisive policies , as we have seen , are always embarrassing decisions ...
... is supposed to be the natural advocate of one of the two conflicting positions . This has relevant consequences for the policy's chances of success . " Pure " divisive policies , as we have seen , are always embarrassing decisions ...
Page 7
Some Advantages of the Policy - Types Approach As we have seen before , each type of policy takes into account , at the same time , the distinctive logic of a type of policy - making process in " pure " conditions .
Some Advantages of the Policy - Types Approach As we have seen before , each type of policy takes into account , at the same time , the distinctive logic of a type of policy - making process in " pure " conditions .
Page 13
On the whole , cabinet decision - making is relatively autonomous and the cabinet tends to be seen more as a working than as a discussing body ( but this depends also on the specific attributes of the ministers and of their organization ) ...
On the whole , cabinet decision - making is relatively autonomous and the cabinet tends to be seen more as a working than as a discussing body ( but this depends also on the specific attributes of the ministers and of their organization ) ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
according adoption agenda allocated allow Analysis avoid become benefits Blondel cabinet choice coalition committees competence complex composite concentrated benefits concentrated costs concerning Consequences consider controversial conversely debate decision-making decisions depends difficulty diffused discussion distributive policies divisive policies Economics effective electoral EUI Working Paper European European University Institute example favour formal gain given groups HAMMOND ideologically divisive ideologically divisive policies impact imply individual influential inside the cabinet instance interests issues Italy kinds of policy least Legislative losers majority Market measures ministers obstacles organized Padova party Peter policy outputs policy-making political position possible potential Power preferences prime principle Probability problems proposals Public Policy pure Reform regulatory regulatory-specific rules Science seen sense situation Social Solution specific SPINA Structures Studies style substantive success tend Theory transformed types of policy typology variable Wilson
Bibliographic information
| Title | EUI Working Paper: SPS, Issues 90-95 EUI Working Paper: SPS, European University Institute. Department of Political and Social Sciences |
| Contributor | European University Institute. Department of Political and Social Sciences |
| Publisher | European University Institute, 1990 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |