Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 18, Part 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1999 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 36
Page 171
... hydrodynamic forces acting on the struc- ture because the hydrodynamic pressure can not be released at the water surface due to existence of the ice sheet . And such a situa- tion may be the most severe loading condition for the ...
... hydrodynamic forces acting on the struc- ture because the hydrodynamic pressure can not be released at the water surface due to existence of the ice sheet . And such a situa- tion may be the most severe loading condition for the ...
Page 175
... hydrodynamic pressure ( g / cm2 ) 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 water depth -0.050m -0.125m -0.425m -0.325m -0.225m- RATIO 1.2 1.0 0.8 with ice 0.6 0.4 without ice 0.2 0.0 3 6 9 12 15 NUMBER OF TERM ( b ) com type structure ...
... hydrodynamic pressure ( g / cm2 ) 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 water depth -0.050m -0.125m -0.425m -0.325m -0.225m- RATIO 1.2 1.0 0.8 with ice 0.6 0.4 without ice 0.2 0.0 3 6 9 12 15 NUMBER OF TERM ( b ) com type structure ...
Page 178
... Hydrodynamic pressure ( g / cm2 / gal ) Fig . 11 Comparison of the numerical results with the results of " ice ... hydrodynamic pressure significantly when the distance between the structure model and crack is about or more than 0.25m ...
... Hydrodynamic pressure ( g / cm2 / gal ) Fig . 11 Comparison of the numerical results with the results of " ice ... hydrodynamic pressure significantly when the distance between the structure model and crack is about or more than 0.25m ...
Contents
OMAE99PA1135 | 19 |
OMAE99PA1141 | 39 |
PROPELLERICE INTERACTION | 53 |
Copyright | |
24 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
analysis angle applied Arctic ASME assumed average blade block boundary calculated Canada channel coefficient component conducted considered constant Copyright crack creep crushed dependence depth determined direction distribution effect Engineering equation estimate experiments factor failure field Figure floes flow force frequency friction function given height horizontal ice force ice loads ice sheet ice thickness iceberg icebreaker included increase indentation indentor interaction International layer length material maximum mean measured Mechanics method Newfoundland observed obtained occurred Offshore operations parameters peak performance predicted present pressure propeller range ratio region Report Research resistance salinity scale scour shape shear ship shown shows similar soil speed stamukha strain strength stress structure surface Table temperature tests thrust torque values vertical wave width wind zone