Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 18, Part 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1999 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 46
Page 15
... respectively . As and Дy denote the difference of & and y between in the clockwise and counter - clockwise shaft turning , respectively . & c and C are the correction of compressive strain and the correction factor , respectively ...
... respectively . As and Дy denote the difference of & and y between in the clockwise and counter - clockwise shaft turning , respectively . & c and C are the correction of compressive strain and the correction factor , respectively ...
Page 190
... respectively ; however , these models over - estimate the horizontal ice force by 37 % and 12 % , respectively . The over - prediction of ice force in the horizontal direction by the Croasdale's model is due to the 2 - D treatment of ...
... respectively ; however , these models over - estimate the horizontal ice force by 37 % and 12 % , respectively . The over - prediction of ice force in the horizontal direction by the Croasdale's model is due to the 2 - D treatment of ...
Page 350
... respectively . For time - independent planetary boundary layer flow conditions the geostrophic drag coefficient ... respectively . g Figures 1 and 2 show C , and 4 ,, respectively , versus Ro for rough turbulent flow . Figures 3 and 4 ...
... respectively . For time - independent planetary boundary layer flow conditions the geostrophic drag coefficient ... respectively . g Figures 1 and 2 show C , and 4 ,, respectively , versus Ro for rough turbulent flow . Figures 3 and 4 ...
Contents
OMAE99PA1135 | 19 |
OMAE99PA1141 | 39 |
PROPELLERICE INTERACTION | 53 |
Copyright | |
24 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
analysis angle applied Arctic ASME assumed average blade block boundary calculated Canada channel coefficient component conducted considered constant Copyright crack creep crushed dependence depth determined direction distribution effect Engineering equation estimate experiments factor failure field Figure floes flow force frequency friction function given height horizontal ice force ice loads ice sheet ice thickness iceberg icebreaker included increase indentation indentor interaction International layer length material maximum mean measured Mechanics method Newfoundland observed obtained occurred Offshore operations parameters peak performance predicted present pressure propeller range ratio region Report Research resistance salinity scale scour shape shear ship shown shows similar soil speed stamukha strain strength stress structure surface Table temperature tests thrust torque values vertical wave width wind zone