Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 18, Part 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1999 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 4
Page 232
... span . Since the height of the pier shafts at piers 31 and 32 are not the same , the model is not symmetric . The effect of the adjacent simply supported drop- in spans is modelled by added masses at the cantilever tips . The ...
... span . Since the height of the pier shafts at piers 31 and 32 are not the same , the model is not symmetric . The effect of the adjacent simply supported drop- in spans is modelled by added masses at the cantilever tips . The ...
Page 242
... span , and a wind sensor that is located at the top of the light standard midway between P31 and P32 . The latter instrument has been set to log data at 1 Hz for all wind speeds in excess of 7 m / sec . This data is used to correct the ...
... span , and a wind sensor that is located at the top of the light standard midway between P31 and P32 . The latter instrument has been set to log data at 1 Hz for all wind speeds in excess of 7 m / sec . This data is used to correct the ...
Page 275
... span . The larger rigidity of a conductor in a bundle between spacers would increase the value of the shape factor and the resulting ice loads on conductor bundles . The second factor is the variation of wind velocities with height ...
... span . The larger rigidity of a conductor in a bundle between spacers would increase the value of the shape factor and the resulting ice loads on conductor bundles . The second factor is the variation of wind velocities with height ...
Contents
OMAE99PA1135 | 19 |
OMAE99PA1141 | 39 |
PROPELLERICE INTERACTION | 53 |
Copyright | |
24 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
analysis angle applied Arctic ASME assumed average blade block boundary calculated Canada channel coefficient component conducted considered constant Copyright crack creep crushed dependence depth determined direction distribution effect Engineering equation estimate experiments factor failure field Figure floes flow force frequency friction function given height horizontal ice force ice loads ice sheet ice thickness iceberg icebreaker included increase indentation indentor interaction International layer length material maximum mean measured Mechanics method Newfoundland observed obtained occurred Offshore operations parameters peak performance predicted present pressure propeller range ratio region Report Research resistance salinity scale scour shape shear ship shown shows similar soil speed stamukha strain strength stress structure surface Table temperature tests thrust torque values vertical wave width wind zone