Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2006 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 70
Page 280
Table 7 : Maximum oil slick inflow into the intake channel Scenario Calculations
Spill Oil type Spill Final Maximum Inflow location size slick Inflow over Volume (
m ) Slick ( m ) ( m ) volume ( % ) | Zakum | 50 , 000 257 , 000 7 , 710 Crude
Zakum ...
Table 7 : Maximum oil slick inflow into the intake channel Scenario Calculations
Spill Oil type Spill Final Maximum Inflow location size slick Inflow over Volume (
m ) Slick ( m ) ( m ) volume ( % ) | Zakum | 50 , 000 257 , 000 7 , 710 Crude
Zakum ...
Page 312
[ m ] wave nr . wave wave maximum force period height per hinge fitting [ kN ] 4 ,
9 1 , 4 9 , 2 5 , 4 2 , 0 34 , 7 3 , 0 42 , 4 6 , 8 4 , 0 51 , 2 7 , 7 1 5 , 6 I 84 , 5 6 8 , 4 6
, 6 l 61 , 0 Table 3 : Full scale maximum forces ( X - direction ) at normal operation
...
[ m ] wave nr . wave wave maximum force period height per hinge fitting [ kN ] 4 ,
9 1 , 4 9 , 2 5 , 4 2 , 0 34 , 7 3 , 0 42 , 4 6 , 8 4 , 0 51 , 2 7 , 7 1 5 , 6 I 84 , 5 6 8 , 4 6
, 6 l 61 , 0 Table 3 : Full scale maximum forces ( X - direction ) at normal operation
...
Page 556
Ponza Licola Mean Maximum Minimum w Foce Sele Licola DDV ( M ) 259 . 6 320
. 0 205 . 0 4 . 0 6 . 2 2 . 0 DDV 274 . 7 305 . 5 197 . 4 9 . 1 12 . 6 3 . 3 Ponza 1000
241 . 5 270 . 0 206 . 0 ( M ) Hs 200 m ( M ) 3 . 0 3 . 6 2 . 4 DDw 237 . 6 270 .
Ponza Licola Mean Maximum Minimum w Foce Sele Licola DDV ( M ) 259 . 6 320
. 0 205 . 0 4 . 0 6 . 2 2 . 0 DDV 274 . 7 305 . 5 197 . 4 9 . 1 12 . 6 3 . 3 Ponza 1000
241 . 5 270 . 0 206 . 0 ( M ) Hs 200 m ( M ) 3 . 0 3 . 6 2 . 4 DDw 237 . 6 270 .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Characterisation of the Wave Profile in the Edinburgh Curved Tank | 1 |
OMAE200692006 | 11 |
OMAE200692020 | 19 |
Copyright | |
7 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis angle applied Arctic ASME assumed bottom boundary calculated coefficient compared comparison components computed considered Copyright cylinder damping defined depth described determined developed direction distribution dynamic effect element energy Engineering equation estimated experimental experiments field Figure flow fluid force frequency function given higher horizontal hull hydrodynamic increase interaction International length lift force linear loads mass maximum mean measured Mechanics method motion nonlinear numerical observed obtained Ocean Offshore operation parameters performance period phase pile position potential prediction present pressure problem propeller range ratio reference relative Research respectively response roll scale ship shown shows significant simulation solution speed station strength stress structure surface Table tank temperature towed University values vehicle velocity vertical vessel wave height wind