Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 1; Volume 7, Part 1American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1988 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 113
... determined . - The axial tension of the pipeline and the radius of curvature ( R2 ) are determined so as not to fail by tension and flexural force . - - The radius of curvature of the pipeline ( R3 ) is determined so as not to fail by ...
... determined . - The axial tension of the pipeline and the radius of curvature ( R2 ) are determined so as not to fail by tension and flexural force . - - The radius of curvature of the pipeline ( R3 ) is determined so as not to fail by ...
Page 265
... determined . This is justified since peaks are shown to be normally distributed . The expected maximum determined from : response E ( x ) can then be E ( x ) = μ + Cσ where = parent sample mean σ = standard deviation C = a multiplier to ...
... determined . This is justified since peaks are shown to be normally distributed . The expected maximum determined from : response E ( x ) can then be E ( x ) = μ + Cσ where = parent sample mean σ = standard deviation C = a multiplier to ...
Page 327
... determined , structural analyses were performed to determine the bending moments and dynamic response for the caisson . Overall , the improved analytical method- ology used in the investigation and the availability of field data to ...
... determined , structural analyses were performed to determine the bending moments and dynamic response for the caisson . Overall , the improved analytical method- ology used in the investigation and the availability of field data to ...
Contents
FLOATING PRODUCTION SYSTEMS | 1 |
Semisubmersible Floating Production for the Gulf of Mexico | 13 |
OFFSHORE MECHANICS | 23 |
Copyright | |
41 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adsorber amplitude analysis angle Arctic Engineering axial bending buoy buoyancy cable calculated coefficient compliant tower components Conference on Offshore curve damage diameter displacement drag coefficient drilling dynamic effect energy equation equipment fatigue Figure finite element flexible floating production flow function horizontal hydrodynamic installation jacket kips length linear load marine mass matrix maximum measured Mechanics and Arctic method mode mode shapes model tests modulus mooring line mooring system motion natural frequency nonlinear obtained Offshore Mechanics Offshore Technology Conference operation parameters performance pile pipe pipe materials pipeline platform polyester pressure production riser random wave ratio response rope rotation RPIT shear shear modulus shear strength shown in Fig simulation soil static stiffness strength stress structure subsea surface syntactic foam turbine uranium vane velocity vertical vessel water depth wave forces wave height wave power weight wellhead wire