Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 1; Volume 7, Part 1American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1988 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 57
Page 426
... drag coefficients ( Cd ) . In the case of Cd -0 , large responses regarded as resonance appear at w = 50 , 100 , 150 and 200. However , those resonances are easily suppressed by small drag coefficient such as Cd = 0.01 or 0.1 as shown ...
... drag coefficients ( Cd ) . In the case of Cd -0 , large responses regarded as resonance appear at w = 50 , 100 , 150 and 200. However , those resonances are easily suppressed by small drag coefficient such as Cd = 0.01 or 0.1 as shown ...
Page 435
... drag . However , combinations of small angles of incidence would tend to concentrate the vorticity on to just one of the lee corners , after which the drag would be less sensitive to further small variations in either yaw or pitch ...
... drag . However , combinations of small angles of incidence would tend to concentrate the vorticity on to just one of the lee corners , after which the drag would be less sensitive to further small variations in either yaw or pitch ...
Page 489
... drag coefficient which has a major affect on the shape of the cable ( 2 ) . Previous experimental studies have shown that the drag coefficient can vary from 1.4 to 3.5 for towed cables and cables moored in a current ( 3,4,5,6 ) . The ...
... drag coefficient which has a major affect on the shape of the cable ( 2 ) . Previous experimental studies have shown that the drag coefficient can vary from 1.4 to 3.5 for towed cables and cables moored in a current ( 3,4,5,6 ) . The ...
Contents
FLOATING PRODUCTION SYSTEMS | 1 |
OFFSHORE MECHANICS | 23 |
Early Production Systems in the North | 31 |
Copyright | |
37 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
analysis angle applied axial bending cable calculated characteristics coefficient components Conference connected considered construction cost curve damage depth determined diameter direction displacement distribution dynamic effect element energy Engineering equation equipment fatigue field Figure flexible flow forces frequency function geometry given important included increase installation International joint length limit linear load lower mass material matrix maximum mean measured Mechanics method mode mooring motion natural normal obtained Offshore operation parameters performance period pile pipe pipeline platform position presented pressure problem production range ratio response riser shear shown shows significant soil static stiffness strength stress structure surface Table Technology tension tower turbine vane vessel wave weight wire