Theory Now and ThenTheory Now and Then contains the more overtly theoretical essays by J. Hillis Miller published between 1966 and 1989. These essays trace the trajectory of theory over the last thirty years in the United States: from the "Continental Shift" announced in the Yale Colloquium of 1965, through Miller's assimilation of the work of the Geneva Critics, to the shift to that "deconstruction in America" in which Miller played a conspicuous role. Included here are review essays on other theorists' work: the Geneva Circle including Georges Poulet; Joseph Riddel, Edward Said, Meyer Abrams; and the critics of the "Yale School," such as Jacques Derrida and others, Paul De Man, Geoffrey Hartman, and Harold Bloom, with whom Miller was associated. Exemplary readings of the theorists themselves, and of texts by Milton, Shelley, Wordsworth, Emerson, George Eliot, Nietzsche, Wallace Stevens, and William Carlos Williams punctuate these essays. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 33
Page 80
... Abrams ' own circuitous journey of interpretation . All the motifs Abrams wants to explore are contained in one way or another in this brief passage and in that proof text for any theory of Romanticism , The Prelude . The multiplicity ...
... Abrams ' own circuitous journey of interpretation . All the motifs Abrams wants to explore are contained in one way or another in this brief passage and in that proof text for any theory of Romanticism , The Prelude . The multiplicity ...
Page 90
... Abrams ' presentation of Romanticism as the " translation ” of the supernaturalism of the Bible and the Platonic tradition into a humanism appropriate for our enlightened age . A literary or philo- sophical text , for Abrams , has a ...
... Abrams ' presentation of Romanticism as the " translation ” of the supernaturalism of the Bible and the Platonic tradition into a humanism appropriate for our enlightened age . A literary or philo- sophical text , for Abrams , has a ...
Page 189
... Abrams really means by " we under - readers who start and stop with the plain sense everyone can agree on " is " I , Meyer Abrams , and those I can persuade to accept my reading . " The evidence against the notion of a broad agreement ...
... Abrams really means by " we under - readers who start and stop with the plain sense everyone can agree on " is " I , Meyer Abrams , and those I can persuade to accept my reading . " The evidence against the notion of a broad agreement ...
Contents
the criticism of Marcel | 13 |
Georges Poulets Criticism | 31 |
Literature and religion | 63 |
Copyright | |
23 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abrams affirms already American appears assumptions attempt base become beginning called changes complex concept consciousness context course criticism culture deconstruction defined Derrida direction discussion English essay example existence experience expression fact fiction figure Freud give given ground hand Heidegger host human idea identified important impossible interpretation kind language lead less linguistic literary literary criticism literary study literature Man's material means metaphor metaphysics mind nature never nevertheless Nietzsche notion novel object once opposition organization origin parasite passage performed perhaps period person philosophy poem poet poetry political possible Poulet present problem question reach reader reading recent relation religious remains rhetoric seems sense speak structure teachers teaching theory things thought tradition translation truth turn understand University whole writing