Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 26Connecticut Bar Association, 1952 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 58
Page 74
... defendant . 54 % found the defendant insured . 18 % either did not know whether the defendant was insured , had accident insurance themselves , were otherwise covered , or did not seek recovery . 34 % of the persons injured had to look ...
... defendant . 54 % found the defendant insured . 18 % either did not know whether the defendant was insured , had accident insurance themselves , were otherwise covered , or did not seek recovery . 34 % of the persons injured had to look ...
Page 110
... defendant's father . The defendant had no interest in the shop , but was employed by his father at a weekly salary . Before the sale was consum- mated , defendant joined with his father and brother in signing an agreement not to engage ...
... defendant's father . The defendant had no interest in the shop , but was employed by his father at a weekly salary . Before the sale was consum- mated , defendant joined with his father and brother in signing an agreement not to engage ...
Page 112
... defendant did participate in negotiating the sale of the barber shop , and as- sisted his father whenever necessary because of the latter's inability to speak English well . 10 Furthermore , the father em- ployed both defendant and his ...
... defendant did participate in negotiating the sale of the barber shop , and as- sisted his father whenever necessary because of the latter's inability to speak English well . 10 Furthermore , the father em- ployed both defendant and his ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
25 CONN accident action amendment American Bar Association apply attorney award custody Bar Association Board of Appeals Boardman child claim Clark CODE PLEADING Committee common law Common Pleas compensation conflict of laws Connecticut Supreme Court constitutional Court of Common Court of Errors criminal decision defendant divorce Domestic Relations domicile effect employees evidence facts faith and credit family court father federal filed full faith habeas corpus Hartford Haven Inglis interest involved judges judgment judicial jurisdiction to award jury Juvenile Court lawyer legislative legislature liability limited matter ment mother motion municipality necticut nuisance Oklahoma parents personal injury personal jurisdiction plaintiff plea in abatement pleadings pre-trial present Probate Court problem procedure question reason residence result rules Section Special Exception STAT statute statutory Superior Court Supp supra note Supreme Court teachers tion trial court trial de novo York Zoning