Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 2; Volume 7, Part 2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1988 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 91
Page 61
... values of C and C are for where 15 < K < 25 . In general , the higher laboratory values of K correlate to the higher R values . But , both K and R are smaller than design values expected in the ocean . The lower value of C for the SMC12 ...
... values of C and C are for where 15 < K < 25 . In general , the higher laboratory values of K correlate to the higher R values . But , both K and R are smaller than design values expected in the ocean . The lower value of C for the SMC12 ...
Page 156
... values were set equal to zero when w > 1.5 rad / sec . The consequence of this is that the true values of H1 / 3 and T2 are dif- ferent from the parameter values used in the spectrum description . True values of H1 / 3 and T are respec ...
... values were set equal to zero when w > 1.5 rad / sec . The consequence of this is that the true values of H1 / 3 and T2 are dif- ferent from the parameter values used in the spectrum description . True values of H1 / 3 and T are respec ...
Page 396
... values is thought to be one of the possible reasons . Although ẞ and are closely related for the same test , the B values may vary for different experiments even under the same value . Maull and Norman conducted their experiment in a ...
... values is thought to be one of the possible reasons . Although ẞ and are closely related for the same test , the B values may vary for different experiments even under the same value . Maull and Norman conducted their experiment in a ...
Contents
HYDRODYNAMIC FORCESI | 1 |
Catchment Regions of Multiple Dynamic Responses in Nonlinear Problems of Offshore Mechanics | 15 |
OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING | 21 |
Copyright | |
40 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acting amplitude analysis angle applied approximately assumed body boundary breaker breaking calculated coefficient compared comparison component computed considered corresponding cylinder damping density depend depth determined diameter direction distribution drag drift force dynamic effects elevation energy Engineering equation estimated excitation experimental experiments expressed field Figure flow fluid free surface frequency function given horizontal hydrodynamic incident increase integral irregular length linear load mass maximum mean measured Mechanics method motion obtained Ocean Offshore oscillation parameters period phase potential predicted present pressure probability problem range ratio region regular waves relative Research respectively response second order shear ship shown shows simulation solution spectra spectrum structure surface Table theory values velocity vertical vortex wave drift wave forces wave height wind