Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 62State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1988 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 35
Page 262
... claimant was 20 % comparatively negligent himself . It is , therefore , important that the collateral source be deducted before the defendant's negligence is applied and before the comparative negligence is applied . Therefore , with ...
... claimant was 20 % comparatively negligent himself . It is , therefore , important that the collateral source be deducted before the defendant's negligence is applied and before the comparative negligence is applied . Therefore , with ...
Page 359
... claimant's damages exceed the uninsured motorist coverage available from any one policy , so that the claimant has been only partially indemnified , " other insurance " clauses are invalid to prohibit the claimant from stacking ...
... claimant's damages exceed the uninsured motorist coverage available from any one policy , so that the claimant has been only partially indemnified , " other insurance " clauses are invalid to prohibit the claimant from stacking ...
Page 361
... claimant accepted $ 18,000 of the $ 20,000 policy limit from Central National , and since his damages exceeded the limits of the Central National policy , he made a claim for uninsured motorist benefits from Aetna . Aetna denied ...
... claimant accepted $ 18,000 of the $ 20,000 policy limit from Central National , and since his damages exceeded the limits of the Central National policy , he made a claim for uninsured motorist benefits from Aetna . Aetna denied ...
Contents
Page | 1 |
SURVEY OF 1987 CONNECTICUT | 11 |
DEVELOPMENTS IN CONNECTICUT | 38 |
Copyright | |
10 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
13 Conn 9 Conn action acts or practices administrative ambiguity amendment antitrust appeal Appellate Court applied attorney referees Board of Education choice of law CHRO claim claimant clauses collateral source common law comparative negligence Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Supreme Court consent constitutional construed consumers Corp Corporation court found Court held CUTPA damages deceptive decision defendant defendant's determine dissenting Dubno exemption federal Federal Trade Commission fees Hartford Haven housing income inflation injury interpretation involved issue judge judgment judicial language lawyers legal services legislative intent legislature liability limited litigation negligence NEPA note 9 parties payment person plaintiff Probate Court Public Act real interest rate reasonable reference regulations rules of construction Section segregation Stamford STAT statute Super Superior Court Supp supra note 15 Tort Reform trial court Trib uninsured motorist coverage violation Waterbury Yonkers Zoning Commission