Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 62State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1988 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 86
Page 262
... Defendant 1 will then pay 30 % of $ 100,000.00 of noneconomic damages and defendant 2 will pay 50 % of $ 100,000.00 of noneconomic damages for $ 80,000.00 of noneconomic damages . The combined total will then be $ 152,000.00 . Note that ...
... Defendant 1 will then pay 30 % of $ 100,000.00 of noneconomic damages and defendant 2 will pay 50 % of $ 100,000.00 of noneconomic damages for $ 80,000.00 of noneconomic damages . The combined total will then be $ 152,000.00 . Note that ...
Page 263
... defendant 2 was completely insolvent , that would mean that $ 50,000.00 of noneconomic damages would be partially redistributed , with defendant one paying 30 % of 50 % , or $ 15,000.00 additional . The remaining $ 35,000.00 would ...
... defendant 2 was completely insolvent , that would mean that $ 50,000.00 of noneconomic damages would be partially redistributed , with defendant one paying 30 % of 50 % , or $ 15,000.00 additional . The remaining $ 35,000.00 would ...
Page 266
... defendant in the controversy . " This is a very liberal section and will allow almost anyone to be brought into the ... defendant 1 may sue defendant 2 for whatever defendant 1 paid of defendant 2's share . In addition , defendant 2 is ...
... defendant in the controversy . " This is a very liberal section and will allow almost anyone to be brought into the ... defendant 1 may sue defendant 2 for whatever defendant 1 paid of defendant 2's share . In addition , defendant 2 is ...
Contents
Page | 1 |
SURVEY OF 1987 CONNECTICUT | 11 |
DEVELOPMENTS IN CONNECTICUT | 38 |
Copyright | |
10 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
13 Conn 9 Conn action acts or practices administrative ambiguity amendment antitrust appeal Appellate Court applied attorney referees Board of Education choice of law CHRO claim claimant clauses collateral source common law comparative negligence Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Supreme Court consent constitutional construed consumers Corp Corporation court found Court held CUTPA damages deceptive decision defendant defendant's determine dissenting Dubno exemption federal Federal Trade Commission fees Hartford Haven housing income inflation injury interpretation involved issue judge judgment judicial language lawyers legal services legislative intent legislature liability limited litigation negligence NEPA note 9 parties payment person plaintiff Probate Court Public Act real interest rate reasonable reference regulations rules of construction Section segregation Stamford STAT statute Super Superior Court Supp supra note 15 Tort Reform trial court Trib uninsured motorist coverage violation Waterbury Yonkers Zoning Commission