Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 62State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1988 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 86
Page 262
defendant 2 will pay 50 % of $ 90,000.00 , for a total of $ 72,000.00 of economic damages . Defendant 1 will then pay 30 % of $ 100,000.00 of noneconomic damages and defendant 2 will pay 50 % of $ 100,000.00 of noneconomic damages for ...
defendant 2 will pay 50 % of $ 90,000.00 , for a total of $ 72,000.00 of economic damages . Defendant 1 will then pay 30 % of $ 100,000.00 of noneconomic damages and defendant 2 will pay 50 % of $ 100,000.00 of noneconomic damages for ...
Page 263
Each solvent defendant will pay his percentage of the economic damages in relationship to the total percentage of negligence of all solvent ... That formula eventually must work out to 100 % when all solvent defendants are considered .
Each solvent defendant will pay his percentage of the economic damages in relationship to the total percentage of negligence of all solvent ... That formula eventually must work out to 100 % when all solvent defendants are considered .
Page 266
a 17 involved therein ; provided no person who is immune from liability shall be made a defendant in the controversy . ... Connecticut General Statutes ) A right of contribution does exist in parties ( defendants ) who , after judgment ...
a 17 involved therein ; provided no person who is immune from liability shall be made a defendant in the controversy . ... Connecticut General Statutes ) A right of contribution does exist in parties ( defendants ) who , after judgment ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Page | 1 |
SURVEY OF 1987 CONNECTICUT | 11 |
DEVELOPMENTS IN CONNECTICUT | 38 |
Copyright | |
12 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action actual administrative allow amended appeal Appellate Court apply attorney authority award Board cause claim claimant clauses clear Commission conclusion conduct Conn Connecticut consent considered constitutional construction construed consumers Corp Corporation Court held coverage CUTPA damages deceptive decision defendant denied determine discussion effect established evidence exemption fact federal fees finding Hartford hearing holding housing income injury intent interest interpretation involved issue judge judgment language lawyers legal services legislative legislature liability limited loss meaning motorist parties payment permit person plaintiff Planning practice present probate procedure protection provides question reasonable reference regulations result rule Stat statement statute statutory substantial Super Superior supra note Supreme Court term Tort trial court Trib unfair uninsured United violation Zoning