The Synoptic Problem: Four Views

Front Cover
Stanley E. Porter, Bryan R. Dyer
Baker Academic, Jul 19, 2016 - Religion - 208 pages
Leading Scholars Debate a Key New Testament Topic

The relationship between Matthew, Mark, and Luke is one of the most contested topics in Gospel studies. How do we account for the close similarities--and differences--in the Synoptic Gospels? In the last few decades, the standard answers to the typical questions regarding the Synoptic Problem have come under fire, while new approaches have surfaced. This up-to-date introduction articulates and debates the four major views. Following an overview of the issues, leading proponents of each view set forth their positions and respond to each of the other views. A concluding chapter summarizes the discussion and charts a direction for further study.
 

Contents

Cover
The Two Source Hypothesis 27
The Farrer Hypothesis 47
The Two Gospel Hypothesis 67
The Orality and Memory Hypothesis 89
Two Source Hypothesis Response 113
Two Gospel Hypothesis Response 139
What Have We Learned regarding the Synoptic Problem and What
Glossary 179
Index of Scripture and Other Ancient Sources 187
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2016)

Stanley E. Porter (PhD, University of Sheffield) is president, dean, professor of New Testament, and Roy A. Hope Chair in Christian Worldview at McMaster Divinity College in Hamilton, Ontario. He has authored or edited dozens of books.

Bryan R. Dyer (PhD, McMaster Divinity College) is acquisitions editor for Baker Academic in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Bibliographic information