Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

Figure 28. Relationship between longitudinal modulus and through-thickness modulus of 3-D composites.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Figure 29. Relationship between inplane shear modulus and through-thickness modulus of 3-D composites.

+

relationship between Gry and Ez for the linear and curvilinear reinforcement systems. For the curvilinear system, Gry increases as Ez increases. This increase reflects the respective sensitivity of the linear and curvilinear-reinforced systems to fiber volume fraction distribution and fiber orientation.

Concluding Remarks

Textile preforms have much to offer in the toughening and manufacture of nextgeneration high-performance structural composites. With a large family of highperformance fibers, linear fiber assemblies, and 2-D and 3-D fiber architectures, a wide range of composite structural performances may be tailored to meet specific requirements.

An examination of the literature indicated that only a limited number of systematic studies have been carried out on fabric-reinforced CCC's (carbon-carbon composites). A well-established data base is needed to stimulate the usage of fabric-reinforced CCC's for structural applications.

The literature suggests a trend toward using 3-D fiber architecture for CCC structural toughening which poses important technical challenges. The first challenge is the question of converting high-modulus yarns to textile structures. The processing difficulty with brittle fibrous structures calls for an innovative combination of materials systems such as the concept of material and geometric hybridization.

The infiltration or placement of matrix material in a dense, 3-D fiber network also creates new challenges and demands an understanding of the dynamics of the process-structure interaction. Questions that must be answered relate to the optimum pore geometry for matrix infiltration, the pore distribution, and the bundle size.

As the level of fiber integration increases, the opportunity of fiber-to-fiber contact intensifies at the crossover points. Guidance is required to select the fiber architecture and matrix placement method best suited to reduce the incidence of localized fiber-rich areas.

To take advantage of the attractive features that textile structural composites offer, a sound data base and design methodologies need to be developed. The fabric geometry models developed so far establish a necessary, but not entirely complete, first step in the modeling of CCC's. Future work in the modeling of fabric-reinforced CCC's requires a better understanding of the dynamic interaction among fiber, matrix processing condition, and fiber architecture.

Acknowledgments

Much of the work on fiber architecture reported herein, and specifically 2-D and 3-D fiber architecture, has been supported by the Office of Naval Research and the Air Force. The assistance provided by Mitchell Marmel of the Fibrous Materials Research Center in the preparation of this manuscript is greatly appreciated.

References

1. Scardino, F. L.: Introduction to Textile Structures. Textile Structural Composites, T. W. Chou and F. K. Ko, eds., Elsevier, 1989, pp. 1–26.

2. Goswami, B. G.; Martindale, J. G.; and Scardino, F. L.: Textile Yarns, Technology, Structure and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, 1977, pp. 273–337.

3. Gac, F. C.: SiC Whisker Staple Yarn Development. Mater. & Process. Rep., vol. 3, no. 1, Apr. 1988, pp. 3-4.

4. Tibbets, G. G.: Vapor Grown Carbon Fibers: Status and Prospects. Res. Publ. GMR-6454, General Motors, Oct. 1988.

5. Dow, N. F.; and Tranfield, G.: Preliminary Investigations of Feasibility of Weaving Triaxial Fabrics (Dow Weave). Textile Res. J., vol. 40, no. 11, Nov. 1970, pp. 986-998.

6. Ko, Frank K.: Braiding. Composites, Volume 1 of Engineered Materials HandbookTM, ASM InternationalTM, c.1987, pp. 519-528.

7. Dow, Norris F.; Ramnath, V.; and Rosen, B. Walter: Analysis of Woven Fabrics for Reinforced Composite Materials-Technical Final Report. NASA CR-178275, 1987.

8. Stover, E. R.; Marx, W. C.; Markowitz, L.; and Mueller, W.: Preparation of an Omniweave-Reinforced Carbon/Carbon Cylinder as a Candidate for Evaluation in the Advanced Heat Shield Screening Program. AFML-TR-70-283, U.S. Air Force, Mar. 1971. (Available from DTIC as AD 884 111.)

9. O'Shea, J.: AutoweaveTM: A Unique Automated 3-D Weaving Technology. Proceedings of the Third Textile Structural Composites Symposium, Drexel Univ., 1988, pp. 210–224.

10. Herrick, John W.: Multidimensional Advanced Composites for Improved Impact Resistance. Materials Synergisms, Volume 10 of National SAMPE Technical Conference, Soc. for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, 1978, pp. 38–50.

11. Pastenbaugh, J.: Aerospatiale Technology. Proceedings of the Third Textile Structural Composites Symposium, Drexel Univ., 1988, pp. 189–209.

12. Bruno, P. S.; Keith, D. O.; and Vicario, A. A., Jr.: Automatically Woven Three-Directional Composite Structures. SAMPE Q., vol. 17, no. 4, July 1986, pp. 10-17.

13. Geoghegan, P. J.: DuPont Ceramics for Structural Applications-The SEP Noveltex Technology. Proceedings of the Third Textile Structural Composites Symposium, Drexel Univ., 1988, pp. 225–239.

14. Fukuta, K.; and Aoki, E.: 3-D Fabrics for Structural Composites. Paper presented at the 15th Textile Research Symposium (Tokyo, Japan), 1986.

15. Fukuta, K.; Onooka, R.; Aoki, E.; and Magatsuka, Y.: Application of Latticed Structural Composite Materials With Three Dimensional Fabrics to Artificial Bones. Bull. Res. Inst. Polym. & Text., vol. 1, no. 131, 1982, p. 151.

16. Ko, F. K.: Three-Dimensional Fabrics for Structural Composites. Textile Structural Composites, T. W. Chou and F. K. Ko, eds., Elsevier, 1989, pp. 129-169.

17. Williams, D. J.: New Knitting Methods Offer Continuous Structures. Adv. Compos. Eng., Summer 1978, pp. 12–13.

18. Hickman, G. T.; and Williams, D. J.: 3-D Knitted Preforms for Structural Reaction Injection Moulding (S.R.I.M.). How To Apply Advanced Composites Technology, ASM InternationalTM, 1988, pp. 367–370.

19. Ko, Frank K.; and Kutz, John: Multiaxial Warp Knit for Advanced Composites. How To Apply Advanced Composites Technology, ASM International, 1988, pp. 377-384.

20. Ko, F. K.; Pastore, C. M.; Yang, J. M.; and Chou, T. W.: Structure and Properties of Multi-directional Warp Knit Fabric Reinforced Composites. Composites '86: Recent Advances in Japan and the United States, Proceedings-JapanU.S. CCM-III, K. Kawata, S. Umekawa, and A. Kobayashi, eds., Tokyo, 1986, pp. 21-28.

21. Ko, Frank K.: Developments of High Damage Tolerant, Net Shape Composites Through Textile. Fifth International Conference on Composite MaterialsICCM-V, William C. Harrigan, Jr., James Strife, and Ashok K. Dhingra, eds., Metallurgical Soc., Inc., 1985, pp. 1201–1210.

22. Brown, R. T.; Patterson, G. A.; and Carper, D. M.: Performance of 3-D Braided Composite Structures. Proceedings of the Third Textile Structural Composites Symposium, Drexel Univ., 1988, pp. 180-185.

23. Popper, Peter; and McConnell, Ronald: A New 3D Braid for Integrated Parts Manufacture and Improved Delamination Resistance-The 2-Step Process. Advanced Materials Technology '87-Volume 32 of International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, Ralph Carson, Martin Burg, Kendall J. Kjoller, and Frank J. Riel, eds., Soc. for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, 1987, pp. 92-103.

24. Popper, Peter; and McConnell, Ronald: U.S. Patent No. 4,719,837, Jan. 19, 1988.

25. McAllister, L. E.; and Lachman, W. L.: Handbook of Composites, Volume 4, Fabrication of Composites, A. Kelly and S. T. Mileiko, eds., North Holland (Amsterdam), 1983.

26. Tarnpol'ski, U. M.; Zhigun, I. G.; and Polyakov, V. A.: Spatially Reinforced Composite Materials Handbook. Moscow Masinostroyeniye, 1987.

27. Adsit, N. R.; Carnahan, K. R.; and Green, J. E.: Mechanical Behavior of Three-Dimensional Composite Ablative Materials. Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Second Conference), ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 497, c.1972, pp. 107-120.

28. Lachman, W. L.; Crawford, J.; and McAllister, L. E.: Multidirectional Reinforced Carbon/Carbon Composites. Proceedings ICCM-II, B. Norton, R. Signorelli, K. Street, and L. Phillips, eds., Metallurgical Soc. AIME, 1978, pp. 1302-1319.

29. Sepcarb Data Sheet, Soc. Europeenne de Propulsion, Saint Medard en Jalles, France, 1985.

30. McAllister, L. E.; and Taverna, A. R.: Development and Evaluation of Mod 3 Carbon/Carbon Composites. Materials Review for '72, Volume 17 of National SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, Soc. of Aerospace Material and Process Engineers, 1972, pp. III-A-THREE-1-III-A-THREE-7.

31. Lamico, P.: Recent Improvement in 4-D Carbon-Carbon Materials for Ablation Resistant Nozzle Parts. AIAA Paper No. 77-822, AIAA/SAE Propulsion 13th Conference, 1977.

« PreviousContinue »