Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Convictions in Political DebateThis vigorous debate between two distinguished philosophers presents two views on a topic of worldwide importance: the role of religion in politics. Audi argues that citizens in a free democracy should distinguish religious and secular considerations and give them separate though related roles. Wolterstorff argues that religious elements are both appropriate in politics and indispensable to the vitality of a pluralistic democracy. Each philosopher first states his position in detail, then responds to and criticizes the opposing viewpoint. Written with engaging clarity, Religion in the Public Square will spur discussion among scholars, students, and citizens. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept action adequate secular reason appropriate Audi Audi's basis beliefs civic virtue coercion comprehensive perspectives concept of liberal concerning conduct consensus consocial constitutional debate decisions and discussions democratic society endorse epistemology essay ethic evidentially adequate fallibilism free and democratic free and equal fully rational gious grounds human Idea of liberal ideal imply independent source institutions interpretation John Locke John Rawls Kent Greenawalt kind law or policy laws or public least liberal democ liberal democracy liberal position Locke matters moral Nicholas Wolterstorff non-religious omnibenevolent one's person philosophy political decisions political issues principle of secular principles of justice proposed public policy public reason question Rawls Rawls's Reformed epistemology relevant religion religious considerations religious convictions religious group religious obligation religious reasons require restraint restrictions Robert Audi role of citizen secular motivation secular rationale Separation of Church sociopolitical theism theo-ethical equilibrium tion virtue ethics voice vote W. D. Ross Wolterstorff