## Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 2; Volume 8, Part 2American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1989 - Arctic regions |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 79

Page 134

Can 0.6 1.9 7.5 9.01 2.5 10 15 20 10 7a - l WAVE LENGTH /

/ BO ) 20 WAVE LENGTH 7

LINEAR SOLUTION , a . 1.0 m LINEARISATION .a - 1.0 m TIME DOMAIN , a .

Can 0.6 1.9 7.5 9.01 2.5 10 15 20 10 7a - l WAVE LENGTH /

**MAXIMUM**BEAM ( V/ BO ) 20 WAVE LENGTH 7

**MAXIMUM**BEAM ( 1 / B ) 70-1 | E ( 1 / m ) 3.5LINEAR SOLUTION , a . 1.0 m LINEARISATION .a - 1.0 m TIME DOMAIN , a .

Page 140

Standard A - 2 C - 2 O A - 2 0 B2-1 I BA - 1 slit 1.0 + 100 A C - 2 Uplift Wave Force

Air Chamber sec 0.5 1.0Bz - 1 A - 1 T = 1.2 sec 10 50 Ratio of

**Maximum**Uplift Wave Force - 09-0 . Eq . ( 15 ) at slit. gf / cm gf / cm 150 150 A - 1Standard A - 2 C - 2 O A - 2 0 B2-1 I BA - 1 slit 1.0 + 100 A C - 2 Uplift Wave Force

Air Chamber sec 0.5 1.0Bz - 1 A - 1 T = 1.2 sec 10 50 Ratio of

**Maximum**Uplift ...Page 148

7 ) The

unseparated flow , the

other hand , the

the flow ...

7 ) The

**maximum**wave force is subjected to the flow separation . In theunseparated flow , the

**maximum**force is proportional to the wave height . On theother hand , the

**maximum**force is in proportion to the squared wave height whenthe flow ...

### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES | 1 |

WaveCurrent Force on Horizontal Cylinder | 7 |

DoubleFactor Method for the Linearization of Drag Force | 39 |

Copyright | |

45 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

added mass amplitude analysis applied approach approximately assumed body boundary calculated circular compared components computed considered correlation corresponding cylinder damping defined depends depth described determined direction distribution drag coefficient drift force effect elements Engineering equation estimate experimental experiments expressed extreme factor failure Figure flow fluid free surface frequency function given horizontal hydrodynamic important in-line included increase indicate integral length lift lift force linear load maximum mean measured Mechanics method mode motion nonlinear normal obtained Offshore oscillation parameters period pipeline potential predicted present pressure probability problem random range ratio reference relative reliability represented respectively response second order separation shear ship shown shows simulation solution structure surface Table term tests theory transverse uncertainty variables varying velocity vertical vortex wave force wave height