Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 35Connecticut Bar Association, 1961 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 88
Page 243
... decision that the standard will be keyed to general competitive conditions rather than to the plight of individual rivals solves fewer problems than it raises . What must be proven to justify a finding of probable substantial52 in- jury ...
... decision that the standard will be keyed to general competitive conditions rather than to the plight of individual rivals solves fewer problems than it raises . What must be proven to justify a finding of probable substantial52 in- jury ...
Page 247
... decision , and no " vested rights ” 23 have arisen . These rules restricting the power of a zoning board of appeals to reverse its prior decisions are not necessarily applicable to a zoning commission when it is acting in its ...
... decision , and no " vested rights ” 23 have arisen . These rules restricting the power of a zoning board of appeals to reverse its prior decisions are not necessarily applicable to a zoning commission when it is acting in its ...
Page 248
... decision.25 STATE COURT SYSTEM Appeals may be had from decisions of zoning commissions , 26 or zoning boards of appeal27 to the Court of Common Pleas of the county in which the municipality concerned is located.28 In order to have ...
... decision.25 STATE COURT SYSTEM Appeals may be had from decisions of zoning commissions , 26 or zoning boards of appeal27 to the Court of Common Pleas of the county in which the municipality concerned is located.28 In order to have ...
Contents
STATE BAR ASSOCIATION OF CONNECTICUT | 1 |
JUNE 1961 NUMBER | 2 |
SEPTEMBER 1961 NUMBER | 3 |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ACLU action administrative Administrative Procedure Act alleged amendment Anheuser-Busch appear attorney authority Bank Bar Association bill Board of Appeals Board of Delegates Boffa Beer capital punishment certificate of incorporation CHAIRMAN TILSON charge claim client Code committee complaints Conn Connecticut constitutional corporation Council Crito death penalty decision defendant defendant's degree murder effect eminent domain evidence fact favor February 28 Federal fund habeas corpus hearing immigration income injury involved judges judgment judicial review jurisdiction jury Justice lawyer legislation liability lien Master Plan matter ment motion municipal negligence nuisance parole person plaintiff planner planning commission police present presumption problem Procedure proceedings purchaser question recovery regulations result Robinson-Patman Act rule Schlitz Section STAT statute strict liability Superior Court Supp supra note Supreme Court tion tort Uniform Commercial Code warranty zoning commission