Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 35Connecticut Bar Association, 1961 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 75
Page 230
... reasons have been given by the courts for this rule denying recovery for incidental damages . The first reason is that these incidental business items are not taken by the condemnor.23 Since the condemnor takes the land and not the ...
... reasons have been given by the courts for this rule denying recovery for incidental damages . The first reason is that these incidental business items are not taken by the condemnor.23 Since the condemnor takes the land and not the ...
Page 231
... reason is not the real reason for the courts ' persistent denial of com- pensation for incidental business damages in condemnation proceedings . The reasoning that such damages are not recoverable because they are speculative has more ...
... reason is not the real reason for the courts ' persistent denial of com- pensation for incidental business damages in condemnation proceedings . The reasoning that such damages are not recoverable because they are speculative has more ...
Page 260
... reasons why an outright sale of the beneficiary's in- terest should not be permitted . The principal reason is that the remedy of the Huntington case is fair to both the creditor and the debtor , whereas an outright sale may be unfair ...
... reasons why an outright sale of the beneficiary's in- terest should not be permitted . The principal reason is that the remedy of the Huntington case is fair to both the creditor and the debtor , whereas an outright sale may be unfair ...
Contents
STATE BAR ASSOCIATION OF CONNECTICUT | 1 |
JUNE 1961 NUMBER | 2 |
SEPTEMBER 1961 NUMBER | 3 |
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ACLU action administrative Administrative Procedure Act alleged amendment Anheuser-Busch appear attorney authority Bank Bar Association bill Board of Appeals Board of Delegates Boffa Beer capital punishment certificate of incorporation CHAIRMAN TILSON charge claim client Code committee complaints Conn Connecticut constitutional corporation Council Crito death penalty decision defendant defendant's degree murder effect eminent domain evidence fact favor February 28 Federal fund habeas corpus hearing immigration income injury involved judges judgment judicial review jurisdiction jury Justice lawyer legislation liability lien Master Plan matter ment motion municipal negligence nuisance parole person plaintiff planner planning commission police present presumption problem Procedure proceedings purchaser question recovery regulations result Robinson-Patman Act rule Schlitz Section STAT statute strict liability Superior Court Supp supra note Supreme Court tion tort Uniform Commercial Code warranty zoning commission