## Proceedings of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi.", Volume 72N. Zanichelli, 1979 - Nuclear physics |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 17

Page 275

In the next step we define compound propositions by means of

Since

propositions are said to be

In the next step we define compound propositions by means of

**dialogs**[ 15 - 18 ] .Since

**dialogs**serve as proof procedures for compound propositions , thesepropositions are said to be

**dialog**- definite . A**dialog**is a formalized kind of ...Page 284

be eliminated in the formal

definition of the logical connectives , the

Therefore , we get the argument - rule : Connectives Attacks A ( 3 ) a ) b )

Defences A ...

be eliminated in the formal

**dialog**- game . Instead we go back to the originaldefinition of the logical connectives , the

**dialogs**of which are of course infinite .Therefore , we get the argument - rule : Connectives Attacks A ( 3 ) a ) b )

Defences A ...

Page 287

rule , A , B the proposition A will , therefore , be presupposed by the opponent as

a hypothesis before the

**dialog**, then proposition B can also be justified dialogically . For the proof of therule , A , B the proposition A will , therefore , be presupposed by the opponent as

a hypothesis before the

**dialog**. The proponent has then to defend the ...### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

Gradual infiltration of probabilitys laws into physical sciences | 1 |

Statistical fluctuations | 10 |

Introduction | 21 |

Copyright | |

24 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

according additive appear applied approach argument assume atoms Borel called classical closed complete concept consider constant corresponding countable course defined definition derived described determined dialog discussion distribution dynamics edited effect elementary elements energy equal equation equivalent example exists experiment expressed fact field final finite formal frequency function geometry give given Hence implies initial interpretation lattice limit logical mass material mathematical means measurement motion natural observable obtain operator particle particular Phys physical positive possible precision present principle probability problem proof propositions proved quantity quantum mechanics question reason refer relation relative represented requirement respect result rules satisfies sense sequence space space-time special relativity statistical structure theorem theory transformation turn unit Universe vector