Connecticut Bar Journal, Volume 41Connecticut Bar Association, 1967 - Bar associations Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 71
Page 341
... duty to denounce these practices to the nearest court . The opinion leaves unanswered the questions of whether or not the duty to inform imposed by Canon 28 can arise in a circumstance in which the potential informant has hearsay , as ...
... duty to denounce these practices to the nearest court . The opinion leaves unanswered the questions of whether or not the duty to inform imposed by Canon 28 can arise in a circumstance in which the potential informant has hearsay , as ...
Page 342
be under a duty to inform if Professor Jones had not notified them of the results of his reports ? 8 The second situation in which an attorney comes under a duty to in- form occurs when he discovers that another attorney is engaged in ...
be under a duty to inform if Professor Jones had not notified them of the results of his reports ? 8 The second situation in which an attorney comes under a duty to in- form occurs when he discovers that another attorney is engaged in ...
Page 344
inform . They do not decide whether this duty to inform can ever be im- puted to another attorney in accordance with agency principles . They do not suggest whether the duty to inform arises when the malpractice involved is not ...
inform . They do not decide whether this duty to inform can ever be im- puted to another attorney in accordance with agency principles . They do not suggest whether the duty to inform arises when the malpractice involved is not ...
Contents
Significance | 1 |
The Right to a Fair and Public Trial An Experiment | 16 |
Federal Summary Judgment Practice | 47 |
Copyright | |
10 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agency alleged amendment American Bar Association application attorney authority bankrupt bankruptcy Board of Appeals Board of Zoning child claim client Committee Conn Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Supreme Court constitutional corporation counsel creditors criminal decision defendant denied Elfbrandt estoppel fact federal filed garnishee garnishment H. J. Res Hartford Haven held Ibid issue Judge judgment judicial jurisdiction Justice juvenile court lawyer legal services legislative liability lien matter ment motion municipality nonconforming obscene officer opinion owner party person petition plaintiff Planning and Zoning planning commission practice present PRESIDENT BOWERMAN problem procedure proceedings question reasonable redevelopment rule security interest Selective Service System South Viet Nam STAT statute statutory subdivision summary judgment Supp supra note Supreme Court tion trial United University of Connecticut variance violation Zoning Appeals Zoning Board Zoning Commission zoning ordinance zoning regulations