## Nuclear Structure and Heavy-ion Dynamics: Varenna on Lake Como, Villa Monastero, 27 July-6 August 1982, Volume 87 |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 70

Page 180

Two modifications should be introduced when one wants to use the SCA to

describe

the

Two modifications should be introduced when one wants to use the SCA to

describe

**collisions**. First , one should go to the energy representation becausethe

**collision**is not specified in terms of the time but in terms of the total energy ...Page 200

Deep inelastic

of simplicity I will consider only one collective degree of freedom — the relative

distance between the

Deep inelastic

**collisions**. – Much of our understanding of DIC is ... For the sakeof simplicity I will consider only one collective degree of freedom — the relative

distance between the

**collision**partners . The discussion will centre around the ...Page 259

On the other hand , one also might expect strong contributions from rather violent

the DWBA may not suffice . In a recent extension of their work [ 32 ] they find ...

On the other hand , one also might expect strong contributions from rather violent

**collisions**in which projectile and target strongly overlap , and for these**collisions**the DWBA may not suffice . In a recent extension of their work [ 32 ] they find ...

### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

Introduction | 3 |

Relation with the collective model | 12 |

A FAESSLER Competition between collective and singlepar | 30 |

Copyright | |

36 other sections not shown

### Other editions - View all

### Common terms and phrases

alignment analysis angle angular distributions angular momentum approximation assumed asymmetry average band barrier beam calculated channel collective collisions component compound consider contributions corresponding coupling cross-section curve decay defined deformation dependence described detector determined direct discussed effect elements emission energy equations evaporation excitation excitation energy expected experiment experimental expression Figure fission fluctuations force fragment function fusion given heavy heavy-ion increase indicated inelastic interaction Legnaro Lett light limit mass mean measured method modes motion neutron Nucl nuclear nuclei nucleons observed obtained operator pairs parameters particles Phys polarization possible potential predictions present probability Q-value reaction region relative residues respectively rotational scattering shape shell shows similar space spectra spin statistical strength structure surface tion trajectory transfer transitions values width y-ray