Connecticut Bar Journal, Volumes 14-15State Bar Association of Connecticut, 1940 - Law Includes Annual reports, and lists of members. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 84
Page 36
... Connecticut shade was evolved in 1894. Then in 1918 came the Vermont shade . Upon the same factual basis Ver- mont held that this is double jeopardy , but that double jeopardy is not such a fundamental right as to warrant protection ...
... Connecticut shade was evolved in 1894. Then in 1918 came the Vermont shade . Upon the same factual basis Ver- mont held that this is double jeopardy , but that double jeopardy is not such a fundamental right as to warrant protection ...
Page 41
... Connecticut is concerned , we must therefore depend mainly upon the Connecticut court to abandon those tendencies . III The Vermont shade of double jeopardy is historically more correct than Connecticut's . State v . Felch , 92 Vt . 477 ...
... Connecticut is concerned , we must therefore depend mainly upon the Connecticut court to abandon those tendencies . III The Vermont shade of double jeopardy is historically more correct than Connecticut's . State v . Felch , 92 Vt . 477 ...
Page 54
... Connecticut ( 1875 ) Page 512 , § 2 , and that the sale of unwholesome milk was only forbidden in 1888 , Public Acts of Connecticut ( 1888 ) § 2658 to § 2664 , whereas , not until the latter part of the 19th century was a general act ...
... Connecticut ( 1875 ) Page 512 , § 2 , and that the sale of unwholesome milk was only forbidden in 1888 , Public Acts of Connecticut ( 1888 ) § 2658 to § 2664 , whereas , not until the latter part of the 19th century was a general act ...
Contents
OCTOBER 1940 No | 4 |
Issued Quarterly by The Connecticut Bar Association | 181 |
THE RIGHT OF PRIVACY James E Wheeler | 271 |
13 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action administrative adopted allowed amended amount appeal application appointed attorney authority Bar Association bill Bridgeport cause charge charter claims client commissioners Committee common compensation condition Conn Connecticut consideration considered constitutional contract costs Council counsel County course criminal decision defendant direct discussion District dollars duty effect evidence examination existence facts filed finding give given Hartford Haven hearing held important injury interest involved issue judges judgment judicial jurisdiction jury justice lawyers legislative legislature limited matter minor courts motion nature necessary negligence nuisance officers opinion party person plaintiff police possible practice present probation problem procedure protection question reason recommended record reference result rule seems situation statement statute suggested Superior Court Supreme Court taken tion tort town trial trustee witness