The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology
University of Chicago Press, May 15, 1996 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 237 pages
Throughout much of the history of linguistics, grammaticality judgments - intuitions about the well-formedness of sentences - have constituted most of the empirical base against which theoretical hypotheses have been tested. Although such judgments often rest on subtle intuitions, there is no systematic methodology for eliciting them, and their apparent instability and unreliability have led many to conclude that they should be abandoned as a source of data. Carson T. Schutze presents here a detailed critical overview of the vast literature on the nature of utility of grammaticality judgments and other linguistic intuitions, and the ways they have been used in linguistic research. He shows how variation in the judgment process can arise from factors such as biological, cognitive, and social differences among subjects, the particular elicitation method used, and extraneous features of the materials being judged. He then assesses the status of judgments as reliable indicators of a speaker's grammar. Integrating substantive and methodological findings, Schutze proposes a model in which grammaticality judgments result from interactions of linguistic competence with general cognitive processes. He argues that this model provides the underpinning for empirical arguments to show that once extragrammatical variance is factored out, universal grammar succumbs to a simpler, more elegant analysis than judgment data initially lead us to expect. Finally, Schutze offers numerous practical suggestions on how to collect better and more useful data. The result is a work of vital importance that will be required reading for linguists, cognitive psychologists, and philosophers of language alike.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Definitions and Historical Background
The Nature of Metalinguistic Performance
SubjectRelated Factors in Grammaticality Judgments
TaskRelated Factors in Grammaticality Judgments
Other editions - View all
The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic ...
Carson T Schutze
No preview available - 2016
ability acceptability actual apparently argue argument asked authors behavior Bever chapter Chomsky claim clear cognitive compared competence concerned conclusion consider consistency constructions context correct describe detailed determine discussed distinction effects elicitation evidence examine example expect experiment experimental explanation fact factors give given grammaticality judgments groups important individual instance instructions interpretation intuitions involved issue judg kinds knowledge language least less linguistic look major mean ments metalinguistic native nature parsing particular performance perhaps position possible potential present principle problem procedure properties propose question ratings reading reason reflect relative relevant repetition reports response scale seems sense sentences similar situation speakers specific stimulus strategies structure subjects suggests tasks tences theoretical theory tion types ungrammatical variation various versus violations