Page images
PDF
EPUB

nishing the number of subjects in which persons who are to spend their lives together take a common in

terest.'

One of the most agreeable consequences of knowledge is the respect and importance which it communicates to old age. Men rise in character often as they increase in years-they are venerable from what they have acquired, and pleasing from what they can impart. If they outlive their faculties, the mere frame itself is respected for what it once contained; but women (such is their unfortunate style of education) hazard every thing upon one cast of the die ;when youth is gone, all is gone. No human creature gives his admiration for nothing: either the eye must be charmed, or the understanding gratified. A woman must talk wisely or look well. Every human being must put up with the coldest civility, who has neither the charms of youth nor the wisdom of age. Neither is there the slightest commiseration for decayed accomplishments;-no man mourns over the fragments of a dancer, or drops a tear on the relics of musical skill. They are flowers destined to perish; but the decay of great talents is always the subject of solemn pity; and, even when their last memorial is over, their ruins and vestiges are regarded with pious affection.

provision; and the gentleness and elegance of women is the natural consequence of that desire to please, which is productive of the greatest part of civilization and refinement, and which rests upon a foundation too deep to be shaken by any such modifications in education as we have proposed. If you educate wo men to attend to dignified and important subjects, you are multiplying, beyond measure, the chances of human improvement, by preparing and medicating those early impressions, which always come from the mother; and which, in a great majority of instances, are quite decisive of character and genius. Nor is it only in the business of education that women would influence the destiny of men. If women know more, men must learn more-for ignorance would then be shameful-and it would become the fashion to be instructed. The instruction of women improves the stock of national talents, and employs more minds for the instruction and amusement of the world;-it in. creases the pleasures of society, by multiplying the topics upon which the two sexes take a common interest; and makes marriage an intercourse of understand. ing as well as of affection, by giving dignity and importance to the female character. The education of women favours public morals; it provides for every season of life, as well as for the brightest and the best ; and leaves a woman when she is stricken by the hand of time, not as she now is, destitute of every thing, and neglected by all; but with the full power and the splendid attractions of knowledge,-diffusing the ele gant pleasures of polite literature, and receiving the just homage of learned and accomplished men.

Remarks on the System of Education in Public Schools. 8vo.

Hatchard. London, 1809.

THERE is a set of well-dressed, prosperous gentle. men who assemble daily at Mr. Hatchard's shop ;clean, civil personages, well in with people in power,

There is no connection between the ignorance in which women are kept, and the preservation of moral and religious principle; and yet certainly there is, in the minds of some timid and respectable persons, a vague, indefinite dread of knowledge, as if it were capable of producing these effects. It might almost be supposed, from the dread which the propagation of knowledge has excited, that there was some great secret which was to be kept in impenetrable obscurity, --that all moral rules were a species of delusion and PUBLIC SCHOOLS. (EDInburgh Review, 1810.) imposture, the detection of which, by the improvement of the understanding, would be attended with the most fatal consequences to all, and particularly to women. If we could possibly understand what these great secrets were, we might perhaps be disposed to concur in their preservation; but believing that all the salutary rules which are imposed on women are delighted with every existing institution—and al the result of true wisdom, and productive of the most with every existing circumstance :—and, every greatest happiness, we cannot understand how they now and then, one of these personages writes a little are to become less sensible of this truth in proportion book;-and the rest praise that little book-expecting as their power of discovering truth in general is in- to be praised, in their turn, for their own little books: creased, and the habit of viewing questions with ac--and of these little books, thus written by these clean, curacy and comprehension established by education. civil personages, so expecting to be praised, the There are men, indeed, who are always exclaiming pamphlet before us appears to be one. against every species of power, because it is connected with danger: their dread of abuses is so much stronger than their admiration of uses, that they would cheerfully give up the use of fire, gunpowder, and printing, to be freed from robbers, incendiaries, and libels. It is true, that every increase of knowledge may possibly render depravity more depraved, as well as it may increase the strength of virtue. It is in itself only power; and its value depends on its application. But, trust to the natural love of good where there is no temptation to be bad-it operates nowhere more forcibly than in education. No man, whether he be tutor, guardian, or friend, ever contents himself with infusing the mere ability to acquire; but giving the power, he gives with a taste for the wise and rational exercise of that power; so that an educated person is not only one with stronger and better faculties than others, but with a more useful propensity-a disposition better cultivated-and associations of a higher and more important class.

The subject of it is the advantage of public schools; and the author, very creditably to himself, ridicules the absurd clamour, first set on foot by Dr. Rennel, of the irreligious tendency of public schools: he then proceeds to an investigation of the effects which pub. fic schools may produce upon the moral character; and here the subject becomes more difficult, and the pamphlet worse.

In arguing any large or general question, it is of in. finite importance to attend to the first feelings which the mention of the topic has a tendency to excite; and the name of a public school brings with it immediately the idea of brilliant classical attainments; but, upon the importance of these studies, we are not now offer. ing any opinion. The only points for consideration are, whether boys are put in the way of becoming good and wise men by these schools; and whether they actually gather there those attainments which it pleases mankind, for the time being, to consider as valuable, and to decorate by the name of learning.

In short, and to recapitulate the main points upon By a public school, we mean any endowed place of which we have insisted-Why the disproportion in education, of old standing, to which the sons of genknowledge between the two sexes should be so great, tlemen resort in considerable numbers, and where when the inequality in natural talents is so small; or they continue to reside, from eight or nine, to eighteen why the understanding of women should be lavished years of age. We do not give this as a definition upon trifles, when nature has made it capable of high- which would have satisfied Porphyry or Duns Scotus, er and better things, we profess ourselves not able to but as one sufficiently accurate for our purpose. The understand. The affectation charged upon female characteristic features of these schools are, their an knowledge is best cured by making that knowledge tiquity, the numbers, and the ages of the young people more general: and the economy devolved upon women who are educated at them. We beg leave, however, is best secured by the ruin, disgrace, and inconveni- to premise, that we have not the slightest intention of ence which proceeds from neglecting it. For the care insinuating any thing to the disparagement of the or' children," nature has made a direct and powerful present discipline or present rulers of these schools,

as compared with other times and other men: we | conciliation towards others, and that anxiety for self have no reason whatever to doubt that they are as improvement, which result from the natural modesty ably governed at this as they have been at any pre-of youth. Nor is this conceit very easily and speedily ceding period. Whatever objections we may have to gotten rid of ;-we have seen (if we mistake not) pubthese institutions, they are to faults, not depending lic school importance lasting through the half of after on present administration, but upon original con- life, strutting in lawn, swelling in ermine, and displaying itself, both ridiculously and offensively, in the haunts and business of bearded men.

struction.*

exercises in which the greatest blockheads commonly excel the most-which often render habits of idleness inveterate-and often lead to foolish expense and dissipation at a more advanced period of life.

At a public school (for such is the system established by immemorial custom), every boy is alter- There is a manliness in the athletic exercises of nately tyrant and slave. The power which the elder public schools which is as seductive to the imaginapart of these communities exercises over the younger tion as it is utterly unimportant in itself. Of what is exceedingly great-very difficult to be controlled-importance is it in after life whether a boy can play and accompanied, not unfrequently, with cruelty and well or ill at cricket; or row a boat with the skill and caprice. It is the common law of the place, that the precision of a waterman? If our young lords and young should be implicitly obedient to the elder boys; esquires were hereafter to wrestle together in public, and this obedience resembles more the submission of or the gentlemen of the Bar to exhibit Olympic games a slave to his master, or of a sailor to his captain, in Hilary Term, the glory attached to these exercises than the common and natural deference which would at public schools would be rational and important. always be shown by one boy to another a few years But of what use is the body of an athlete, when we older than himself. Now, this system we cannot have good laws over our heads, or when a pistol, a help considering as an evil,-because it inflicts upon postchaise, or a porter, can be hired for a few shil. boys, for two or three years of their lives, many pain-lings? A gentleman does nothing but ride or walk; ful hardships, and much unpleasant servitude. These and yet such a ridiculous stress is laid upon the man. sufferings might perhaps be of some use in military liness of the exercises customary at public schoolsschools; but, to give to a boy the habit of enduring privations to which he will never again be called upon to submit-to inure him to pains which he will never again feel-and to subject him to the privation of comforts with which he will always in future abound-is One of the supposed advantages of a public school surely not a very useful and valuable severity in edu- is the greater knowledge of the world which a boy is cation. It is not the life in miniature which he is to considered to derive from those situations; but if, by lead hereafter-nor does it bear any relation to it :- a knowledge of the world, is meant a knowledge of he will never again be subjected to so much insolence the forms and manners which are found to be the most and caprice; nor ever, in all human probability, called pleasing and useful in the world, a boy from a public upon to make so many sacrifices. The servile obedi- school is almost always extremely deficient in these ence which it teaches might be useful to a menial particulars; and his sister, who has remained at home domestic; or the habits of enterprise which it en- at the apron-strings of her mother, is very much his courages prove of importance to a military partisan; superior in the science of manners. It is probably but we cannot see what bearing it has upon the calm, true, that a boy at a public school has made more cb. regular, civil life, which the sons of gentlemen, des- servations on human character, because he has had tined to opulent idleness, or to any of the three learned more opportunities of observing than have been enprofessions, are destined to lead. Such a system |joyed by young persons educated either at home or at makes many boys very miserable; and produces those private schools: but this little advance gained at a bad effects upon the temper and disposition, which public school is so soon overtaken at college or in the unjust suffering always does produce; but what good world, that, to have made it, is of the least possible it does we are much at a loss to conceive. Reasonable consequence, and utterly undeserving of any risk inobedience is extremely useful in forming the disposition. Submission to tyranny lays the foundation of hatred, suspicion, cunning, and a variety of odious passions. We are convinced that those young people will turn out to be the best men, who have been guarded most effectually in their childhood, from every species of useless vexation; and experienced, in the greatest degree, the blessings of a wise and rational indulgence. But even if these effects upon future character are not produced, still four or five years in childhood make a very considerable period of human existence; and it is by no means a trifling consideration whether they are passed happily or unhappily. The wretchedness of school tyranny is trifling enough to a man who only contemplates it in ease of body and tranquillity of mind, through the medium of twenty intervening years; but it is quite as real, and quite as acute, while it lasts, as any of the sufferings of mature life and the utility of these sufferings, or the price paid in compensation for them, should be clearly made out to a conscientious parent before he consents to expose his children to them.

This system also gives to the elder boys an absurd and pernicious opinion of their own importance, which is often with difficulty effaced by a considerable commerce with the world. The head of a public school is generally a very conceited young man, utterly ignorant of his own dimensions, and losing all that habit of

* A public school is thought to be the best cure for the insolence of youthful aristocracy. This insolence, however, is not a little increased by the homage of masters, and would soon meet with its natural check in the world. There can be no occasion to bring five hundred boys together to teach a young nobleman that proper demeanor which he would learn so much better from the first English gentleman whom he might think proper to insult.

curred in the acquisition. Is it any injury to a man of thirty or thirty-five years of age to a learned ser jeant or venerable dean-that at eighteen they did not know so much of the world as some other boys of the same standing? They have probably escaped the arrogant character so often attendant upon this trifling superiority; nor is there much chance that they have ever fallen into the common and youthful error of mistaking a premature initiation into vice for a knowledge of the ways of mankind; and, in addition to these salutary exemptions, a winter in London brings it all to a level; and offers to every novice the ad vantages which are supposed to be derived from this precocity of confidence and polish.

According to the general prejudice in favour of public schools, it would be thought quite as absurd and superflous to enumerate the illustrious characters who have been bred at our three great seminaries of this description, as it would be to descant upon the illus trious characters who have passsed in and out of London over our three great bridges. Almost eve ry conspicuous person is supposed to have been educated at public schools; and there are scarce. ly any means (as it is imagined) of making an actual comparison; and yet, great as the rage is, and long has been, for public schools, it is very remark able, that the most eminent men in every art and science have not been educated at public schools; and this is true, even if we include, in the term of public schools, not only Eton, Winchester, and Westminster, but the Charter-House, St. Paul's School, Merchant Tailors', Rugby, and every school in England, at all conducted upon the plan of the three first. The great schools of Scotland we do not call public schools; because, in these, the mixture of domestic life gives to them a widely different character. Spenser, Pope,

Shakspeare, Butler, Rochester, Spratt, Parnell, Garth, Congreve, Gay, Swift, Thompson, Shenstone, Akenside, Goldsmith, Samuel Johnson, Beaumont and Fletcher, Ben Jonson, Sir Philip Sydney, Savage, Arbuthnot, and Burns, among the poets, were not educated in the system of English schools. Sir Isaac Newton, Maclaurin, Wallis, Hamstead, Saunderson, Simpson, and Napier, among men of science, were not educated at public schools. The three best historians that the English language has produced, Clarendon, Hume, and Robertson, were not educated at public schools. Public schools have done little in England for the fine arts-as in the examples of Inigo Jones, Vanbrugh, Reynolds, Gainsborough, Garrick, &c. The great medical writer and discoverers in Great Britain, Harvey, Cheselden, Hunter, Jenner, Meade, Brown, and Cullen, were not educated at public schools. Of the great writers on morals and metaphysics, it was not the system of public schools which produced Bacon, Shaftesbury, Hobbes, Berkeley, Butler, Hume, Hartley, or Dugald Stewart. The greatest discoverers in chemistry have not been brought up at public schools;-we mean Dr. Priestley, Dr. Black, and Mr. Davy. The only Englishmen who have evinced a remarkable genius, in modern times, for the art of war, the Duke of Marlborough, Lord Peter. borough, General Wolfe, and Lord Clive, were all trained in private schools. So were Lord Coke, Sir Matthew Hale, and Lord Chancellor Hardwicke, and Chief Justice Holt, among the lawyers. So also, among statesmen, were Lord Burleigh, Walsingham, the Earl of Strafford, Thurloe, Cromwell, Hampden, Lord Clarendon, Sir Walter Raleigh, Sydney, Russel, Sir W. Temple, Lord Somers, Burke, Sheridan, Pitt. In addition to this list, we must not forget the name, of such eminent scholars and men of letters, as Cudworth, Chillingworth, Tillotson, Archbishop King, Selden, Conyers, Middleton, Bentley, Sir Thomas More, Cardinal Wolsey, Bishops Sherlock and Wilkins, Jeremy Taylor, Isaac Hooker, Bishops Usher, Stillingfleet, and Spelman, Dr. Samuel Clarke, Bishop Hoadley, and Dr. Lardner. Nor must it be forgotten, in this examination, that none of the conspicious writers upon political economy which this country has as yet produced, have been brought up in public schools. If it be urged that public schools have only assumed their present character within this last century, or half century, and that what are now called public schools partook, before this period, of the nature of private schools, there must then be added to our lists the names of Milton, Dryden, Addison, &c. &c. and it will follow, that the English have done almost all that they have done in the arts and sciences, without the aid of that system of education to which they are now so much attached. Ample as this catalogue of celebrated names already is, it would be easy to double it; yet, as it stands, it is obviously sufficient to show that great eminence may be attained in any line of fame without the aid of public schools. Some more striking inferences might perhaps be drawn from it; but we content ourselves with the simple fact.

The most important peculiarity in the constitution of a public school is its numbers, which are so great, that a close inspection of the master into the studies and conduct of each individual is quite impossible. We must be allowed to doubt, whether such an arrangement is favourable either to literature or morals. Upon this system, a boy is left almost entirely to himself, to impress upon his own mind, as well as he can, the distant advantages of knowledge, and to withstand, from his own innate resolution, the examples and the seductions of idleness. A firm character survives this brave neglect; and very exalted talents may sometimes remedy it by subsequent diligence: but schools are not made for a few youths of pre-eminent talents, and strong characters; such prizes can, of course, be drawn but by a very few parents. The best school is that which is best accommodated to the greatest variety of characters, and which embraces the greatest number of cases. It cannot be the main object of education to render the splendid more splen

did, and to lavish care upon those who would almost thrive without any care at all. A public school does this effectually; but it commonly leaves the idle almost as idle, and the dull almost as dull, as it found them. It disdains the tedious cultivation of those middling talents of which only the great mass of human beings are possessed. When a strong desire of improvement exists, it is encouraged, but no pains are taken to inspire it. A boy is cast in among five or six hundred other boys, and is left to form his own character;-if his love of knowledge survives this severe trial, it, in general, carries him very far: and, upon the same principle, a savage, who grows up to manhood, is, in general, well made, and free from all bodily defects; not because the severities of such a state are favourable to animal life, but because they are so much the reverse, that none but the strongest can survive them. A few boys are incorrigibly idle, and a few incorrigibly eager for knowledge; but the great mass are in a state of doubt and fluctuation; and they come to school for the express purpose, not of being left to themselves-for that could be done any where-but that their wavering tastes and propensities should be decided by the intervention of a master. In a forest, or public school for oaks and elms, the trees are left to themselves; the strong plants live, and the weak ones die: the towering oak that remains is admired; the saplings that perish around it are cast into the flames and forgotten. But it is not surely to the vegetable struggle of a forest, or the hasty glance of a forester, that a botanist would commit a favourite plant; he would naturally seek for it a situation of less hazard, and a cultivator whose limited occupations would enable him to give to it a reasonable share of his time and attention. The very meaning of education seems to us to be, that the old should teach the young, and the wise direct the weak; that a man who professes to instruct, should get among his pupils, study their characters, gain their affections, and form their inclinations and aversions. In a public school, the numbers render this impossible; it is impossible that sufficient time should be found for this useful and affectionate interference. Boys, therefore, are left to their own crude conceptions and ill-formed propensities; and this neglect is called a spirited and manly education.

In by far the greatest number of cases, we cannot think public schools favourable to the cultivation of knowledge; and we have equally strong doubts if they be so to the cultivation of morals, though we admit, that, upon this point, the most striking arguments have been produced in their favour.

It is contended by the friends to public schools, that every person, before he comes to man's estate, must run through a certain career of dissipation; and if that career is, by the means of a private education, deferred to a more advanced period of life, it will only be begun with more eagerness, and pursued into more blameable excess. The time must, of course, come when every man must be his own master; when his conduct can be no longer regulated by the watchful superintendence of another, but must be guided by his own discretion. Emancipation must come at last; and we admit, that the object to be aimed at is, that such emancipation should be gradual, and not premature. Upon this very invidious point of the discussion, we rather wish to avoid offering any opinion. The manners of great schools vary considerably from time to time; and what may have been true many years ago, is very possibly not true at the present period. In this instance, every parent must be governed by his own observations and means of informa tion. If the license which prevails at public schools is only a fair increase of liberty, proportionate to advancing age, and calculated to prevent the bad effects of a sudden transition from tutelary thraldom to per fect self-government, it is certainly a good rather than an evil. If, on the contrary, there exists in these places of education a system of premature debauchery, and if they only prevent men from being corrupted by the world, by corrupting them before their entry into the world, they can then only be looked upon as evils

[blocks in formation]

TOLERATION. (EDINBURGH REVIEW, 1811.) Hints on Toleration, in Five Essays, &c. suggested for the

Consideration of Lord Viscount Sidmouth, and the Dissenters. By Philagatharches. London. 1810.

The vital and essential part of a school is the master; but, at a public school, no boy, or, at the best, only a very few, can see enough of him to derive any Ir a prudent man sees a child playing with a porceconsiderable benefit from his character, manners, and lain cup of great value, he takes the vessel out of his information. It is certainly of eminent use, particu- hand, pats him on the head, tells him his mamma will larly to a young man of rank, that he should have be sorry if it is broken, and gently cheats him into the lived among boys; but it is only so when they are all use of some less precious substitute. Why will Lord moderately watched by some superior understanding. Sidmouth meddle with the Toleration Act, when there The morality of boys is generally very imperfect; are so many other subjects in which his abilities might their notions of honour extremely mistaken; and their be so eminently useful-when enclosure bills are drawn objects of ambition frequently very absurd. The pro- up with such scandalous negligence-turnpike roads so bability then is, that the kind of discipline they exer- shamefully neglected-and public conveyances ill giti. cise over each other will produce (when left to itself) mately loaded in the face of day, and in defiance of the a great deal of mischief; and yet this is the discip-wisest legislative provisions? We confess our trepi line to which every child at a public school is not only dation at seeing the Toleration Act in the hands of necessarily exposed, but principally confined. Our Lord Sidmouth; and should be very glad if it were objection (we again repeat) is not to the interference fairly back in the statute book, and the sedulity of this of boys in the formation of the character of boys; well-meaning nobleman diverted into another channel. their character, we are persuaded, will be very im The alarm and suspicion of the Dissenters upon perfectly formed without their assistance; but our these measures are wise and rational. They are right objection is to that almost exclusive agency which to consider the Toleration Act as their palladium; and they exercise in public schools. they may be certain that in this country there is always a strong party ready, not only to prevent the further extension of tolerant principles, but to abridge (if they dared) their present operation within the narrowest limits. Whoever makes this attempt, will be sure to make it under professions of the most earnest regard for mildness and toleration, and with the strongest declarations of respect for King William, the Revolu tion, and the principles which seated the House of Brunswick on the throne of these realms; and then will follow the clauses for whipping Dissenters, imprisoning preachers, and subjecting them to rigid qualifications, &c. &c. &c. The infringement on the militia acts is a mere pretence. The real object is to diminish the number of Dissenters from the Church of England, by abridging the liberties and privileges they now possess. This is the project which we shall examine, for we sincerely believe it to be the project in agitation. The mode in which it is proposed to attack the Dissenters is, first, by exacting greater qualifica tions in their teachers; next, by preventing the interchange or itinerancy of preachers, and fixing them to one spot.

After having said so much in opposition to the general prejudice in favour of public schools, we may be expected to state what species of school we think preferable to them; for if public schools, with all their disadvantagas, are the best that can actually be found, or easily attained, the objections to them are certainly made to very little purpose.

We have no hesitation, however, in saying, that that education seems to us to be the best which mingles a domestic with a school life; and which gives to a youth the advantage which is to be derived from the learning of a master, and the emulation which results from the society of other boys, together with the affectionate vigilance which he must experience in the house of his parents. But where this species of education, from peculiarity of circumstances or situation, is not attainable, we are disposed to think a society of twenty or thirty boys, under the guidance of a learned man, and, above all, of a man of good sense, to be a seminary the best adapted for the education of youth. The numbers are sufficient to excite a considerable degree of emulation, to give to a boy some insight into the diversities of the human character, and to subject him to the observation and control of his superiors. It by no means follows, that a judicious man should always interfere with his authority and advice because he has always the means; ne may connive at many things which he cannot approve, and suffer some little failures to proceed to a certain extent, which, if indulged in wider limits, would be attended with irretrievable mischief; he will be aware, that his object is to fit his pupil for the world; that constant control is a very bad preparation for complete emancipation from all control; that it is not bad policy to expose a young man, under the eye of superior wisdom, to some of those dangers which will assail him hereafter in greater number, and in greater strength-when he has only his own resources to depend upon. A private education, conducted upon these principles, is not calculated to gratify quickly the vanity of a parent who is blest with a child of strong character and pre-eminent abilities; to be the first scholar of an obscure master, at an obscure place, is no very splendid distinction; nor does it afford that opportunity, of which so many parents are desirous, of forming great connections for their children: but if the object be, to induce the young to love knowledge and virtue, we are inclined to suspect, that, for the average of human talents and characters, these are the situations in which such tastes will be the most effectually formed.

It can never, we presume, be intended to subject dissenting ministers to any kind of theological examination. A teacher examined in doctrinal opinions, by another teacher who differs from him, is so very absurd a project, that we entirely acquit Lord Sidmouth of any intention of this sort. We rather presume his lordship to mean, that a man who professes to teach his fellow creatures, should at least have made some progress in human learning; that he should not be wholly without education; that he should be able at least to read and write. If the test is of this very ordinary nature, it can scarcely exclude many teachers of religion; and it was hardly worth while, for the very insignificant diminution of numbers which this must occasion to the dissenting clergy, to have raised all the alarm which this attack upon the Toleration Act has occasioned.

But without any reference to the magnitude of the effects, is the principle right? or, What is the meaning of religious toleration? That a man should hold, without pain or penalty, any religious opinions-and choose for his instruction, in the business of salvation, any guide whom he pleases; care being taken that the teacher and the doctrine injure neither the policy nor the morals of the country. We maintain that perfect religious toleration applies as much to the teacher as to the thing taught; and that it is quite as intolerant to make a man hear Thomas, who wants to hear John, as it would be to make a man profess Arminian, who wished to profess Calvinistical principles. What right has any government to dictate to any man who shall guide him to heaven, any more than it has to persecute the religious tenets by which he hopes to arrive there? You believe that the heretic professes doctrines utterly incompatible with the true spirit of the gospel; first you burnt him for this-then you whipped him-then

turned into a persecution against persons. The prisons will be filled-the enemies of the Church made enemies of the state also-and the Methodists rendered ten times more actively mad than they are at present. This is the direct and obvious tendency of Lord Sidmouth's plan.

you fined him-then you put him in prison. All this | pid preacher popular, and a popular preacher more did no good; and for these hundred years last past, popular, but can have no possible tendency to prevent you have let him alone. The heresy is now firmly the mischief against which it is levelled. It is preprotected by law; and you know is must be preached: | cisely the old history of persecution against opinions Waat matters it then, who preaches it? If the evil must be communicated, the organ and instrument through which it is communicated cannot be of much consequence. It is true, this kind of persecution against persons, has not been quite so much tried as the other against doctrines; but the folly and inexpediency of it rest precisely upon the same grounds. Would it not be a singular thing if the friends of the Church of England were to make the most strenuous efforts to render their enemies eloquent and learned? and to found places of education for dissenters? But, if their learning would not be a good, why is their ig. norance an evil?-unless it be necessarily supposed, that all increase of learning must bring men over to the Church of England; in which supposition the Scottish and Catholic universities, and the college at Hackney, would hardly acquiesce. Ignorance surely matures and quickens the progress, by insuring the dissolution of absurdity. Rational and learned dissenters remain religious mobs, under some ignorant fanatic of the day, become foolish overmuch-dissolve, and return to the Church. The Unitarian, who reads and writes, gets some sort of discipline, and returns no

more

What connection is there (as Lord Sidmouth's plan assumes) between the zeal and piety required for religious instruction, and the common attainments of literature? But if knowledge and education are required for religious instruction, why be content with the common elements of learning? why not require higher attainments in dissenting candidates for orders; and examine them in the languages in which the books of their religion are conveyed?

A dissenting minister, of vulgar aspect and homely appearance, declares that he entered into that holy office because he felt a call; and a clergyman of the Establishment smiles at him for the declaration. But it should be remembered, that no minister of the Establishment is admitted into orders, before he has been expressly interrogated by the bishop whether he feels himself called to that sacred office. The doctrine of calling, or inward feeling, is quite orthodox in the English Church; and, in arguing this subject in parlia ment, it will hardly be contended, that the Episcopalian only is the judge when that call is genuine, and when it is only imaginary.

The attempt at making the dissenting clergy sta. tionary, and persecuting their circulation, appears to us quite as unjust and inexpedient as the other measure of qualifications. It appears a gross inconsistency to say, I admit that what you are doing is legal-but you must not do it thoroughly and effectually. I allow you to propagate your heresy, but I object to all means of propagating it which appear to be useful and effective. If there are any other grounds upon which the circulation of the dissenting clergy is objected to, let these grounds be stated and examined; but to object to their circulation merely because it is the best method of effecting the object which you allow them to effect, does appear to be rather unnatural and inconsistent.

It is presumed, in this argument, that the only reason urged for the prevention of itinerant preachers is, the increase of heresy; for if heresy is not increased by it, it must be immaterial to the feelings of Lord Sidmouth, and of the imperial parliament, whether Mr. Shufflebottom preaches at Bungay, and Mr. Ringletub at Ipswich; or whether an artful vicissitude is adopted, and the order of insane predication reversed. But, supposing all this new interference to be just, what good will it do? You find a dissenting preacher, whom you have prohibited, still continuing to preach, or preaching at Ealing when he ought to preach at Acton his number is taken, and the next morning he is summoned. Is it believed that this description of persons can be put down by fine and imprisonment? His fine is paid for him, and he returns from imprisonment ten times as much sought after and as popular as he was before. This is a receipt for making a stu

Nothing dies so hard and rallies so often as intole rauce. The fires are put out, and no living nostril has scented the nidor of a human creature roasted for faith; then, after this, the prison-doors were got open, and the chains knocked off; and now Lord Sidmouth only begs that men who disagree with him in religious opinions may be deprived of all civil offices, and not be allowed to hear the preachers they like best. Chains and whips, he would not hear of; but these mild gratifications of his bill every orthodox mind is surely entitled to. The hardship would indeed be great if a churchman were deprived of the amusement of putting a dissenting parson in prison. We are con vinced Lord Sidmouth is a very amiable and well-intentioned man: his error is not the error of his heart, but of his time, above which few men ever rise. It is the error of some four or five hundred thousand English gentlemen, of decent education and worthy characters, who conscientiously believe that they are punishing, and continuing incapacities, for the good of the state; while they are, in fact (though without knowing it) only gratifying that insolence, hatred, and revenge, which all human beings are unfortunately so ready to feel against those who will not conform to their own sentiments.

But, instead of making the dissenting churches po pular, why not make the English church more popular, and raise the English clergy to the privileges of the Dissenters? In any parish of England, any layman or clergyman, by paying sixpence, can open a place of worship,-provided it be not the worship of the Church of England. If he wishes to attack the doctrines of the bishop or the incumbent, he is not compelled to ask the consent of any person; but if, by any evil chance, he should be persuaded of the truth of those doctrines, and build a chapel or mount a pulpit to support them, he is instantly put in the spiritual court; for the regular incumbent, who has a legal monopoly of this doctrine, does not suffer any interloper; and without his consent, it is illegal to preach the doctrines of the church within his precincts. Now this appears to us a great and manifest absurdity, and a disadvantage against the Established Church which very few establishments could bear. The persons who preach and who build chapels, or for whom chapels are built, among the Dissenters, are active cle

It might be supposed that the general interests of the and that any clergyman would be glad to see places of worChurch would outweigh the particular interests of the rector; ship opened within his parish for the doctrines of the Established Church. The fact, however, is exactly the reverse. It is scarcely possible to obtain permission from the established clergyman of the parish to open a chapel there; and when it is granted, it is granted upon very hard and interested conditions. The parishes of St. George-of St. James-of rish churches, chapels of ease, and mercenary chels, conMary-le-bone-and of St. Ann's, in London-may. in the patain, perhaps, one-hundredth part of their Episcopalian inhabitants. Let the rectors, lay and clerical, meet together, and give notice that any clergyman of the Church of England, approved by the bishop, may preach there; and we will venture to say that places of worship capable of containing 20,000 persons would be built within ten years. But, in these cases, the interest of the rector and of the Establishment is not the ists of the New Jerusalem, was offered, two or three years same. A chapel belonging to the Swedenborgians, or Methodsince, in London, to a clergyman of the Establishment. I ne proprietor was tired of his irrational tenants, and wished for better doctrine. The rector (since a dignitary) with every possible compliment to the fitness of the person in question, positively refused the application; and the church remains in by this anecdote, against the individual rector. He acted as the hands of the Methodists. No particular blame is intended, many have done before and since; but the incumbent clergyman ought to possess no such power. It is his interest, but not the interest of the Establishment.

« PreviousContinue »