Page images
PDF
EPUB

Some grammarians apply, what is called the conjunctive termination, to the persons of the principal verb, and to its auxiliaries, through all the tenses of the subjunctive mood. But this is certainly contrary to the practice of good writers. Johnson applies this termination to the present and perfect tenses only. Lowth restricts it entirely to the present tense; and Priestley confines it to the present and imperfect tenses. This difference of opinion amongst grammarians of such eminence, may have contributed to that diversity of practice, so observable in the use of the subjunctive mood. Uniformity in this point is highly desirable. It would materially assist both teachers and learners; and would constitute a considerable improvement in our language. On this subject, we adopt the opinion of Dr. Lowth; and conceive we are fully warranted by his authority, and that of the most correct and elegant writers, in limiting the conjunctive termination of the principal verb, to the second and third persons singular of the present tense Grammarians have not only differed in opinion, respecting the extent and variations of the subjunctive mood; but a few of them have even doubted the existence of such a mood in the English language. These writers assert, that the verb has no variation from the indicative; and that a conjunction added to the verb, gives it no title to become a distinct mood; or, at most, no better than it would have, if any other particle were joined to it. To these observations it may be replied; 1st. It is evident, on inspection, that, in the subjunctive mood, the present tense of the principal verbs, the present and imperfect tenses of the verb to be, and the second and third persons, in both numbers, of the second future tense of all verbst; require a variation from the forms which those tenses have in the indicative mood. So much difference in the form of the verb, would warrant a correspondent distinction of mood,

We think it has been proved, that the auxiliary is a constituent part of the vers to which it relates: that the principal and its auxiliary form but one verb

though the remaining parts of the subjunctive were, in all respects, similar to those of the indicative. In other lan guages, a principle of this nature has been admitted, both in the conjugation of verbs, and the declension of nouns 2d. There appears to be as much propriety, in giving a conjunction the power of assisting to form the subjunctive mood, as there is in allowing the particle to to have an ef fect in the formation of the infinitive moodt. 3d. A conjunction added to the verb, shows the manner of being, doing, or suffering, which other particles cannot show : they do not coalesce with the verb, and modify it, as conjunctions do. 4th. It may be said, "If contingency constitutes the subjunctive mood, then it is the sense of a phrase, and not a conjunction, that determines this mood." But a little reflection will show, that the contingent sense lies in the meaning and force of the conjunction, expressed or understood.

This subject may be farther illustrated, by the following observations.-Moods have a foundation in nature. They show what is certain; what is possible; what is conditional; what is commanded. They express also other conceptions and volitions; all signifying the manner of being, doing, or suffering. But as it would tend to obscure, rather than elucidate the subject, if the moods were particularly enumerated, grammarians have very properly given them such combinations and arrangements, as serve to explain the nature of this part of language, and to render the knowledge of it easily attainable.

The grammars of some languages contain a greater number of the moods, than others, and exhibit them in different forms. The Greek and Roman tongues denote them, by particular variations in the verb itself. This form, however, was the effect of ingenuity and improvement: it is not essential to the nature of the subject. The moods

Conjunctions have an influence on the mood of the following verb.
Conjunctions have sometimes a government of moods.

Dr. Beattie.

Dr. Lenta

may be as effectually designated by a plurality of words, as by a change in the appearance of a single word; because the same ideas are denoted, and the same ends accomplished, by either manner of expression.

On this ground, the moods of the English verb, as well as the tenses, are, with great propriety, formed partly by the principal verb itself, and partly by the assistance which that verb derives from other words. For further observations, relative to the views and sentiments here advanced, see pages 78-80. 84-86. 108-111. 201-203.

PASSIVE.

VERBS Passive are called regular, when they form their perfect participle by the addition of d or ed, to the vero as, from the verb "To love," is formed the passive," I am loved, I was loved, I shall be loved," &c.

A passive verb is conjugated by adding the perfect participle to the auxiliary to be, through all its changes of number, person, mood, and tense, in the following

[blocks in formation]

1. I have been loved.

PLURAL.

1. We were loved.

2. Ye or you were loved.
3. They were loved.

PERFECT TENSE.

2. Thou hast been loved.

PLURAL.

1. We have been loved.

2. Ye or you have been loved.

3. He hath or has been loved. 3. They have been loved.

[blocks in formation]

2. Thou shalt or wilt be lov- 2. Ye or you shall or will be ed.

loved.

3. He shall or will be loved. 3. They shall or will be loved.

SINGULAR.

SECOND FUTURE TENSE.

F. I shall have been loved. 1.

2. Thou wilt have been lov- 2. ed.

PLURAL.

We shall have been loved.

Ye or you will have been loved.

3. He will have been loved. 3. They will have been loved.

[blocks in formation]

1. I may or can be loved.

2. Thou mayst or canst be loved.

1.

PLURAL.

We may or can be loved. 2. Ye or you may or can be loved.

3. He may or can be loved. 3. They may or can be loved.

[blocks in formation]

1. I might, could, would, or 1. We might, could, would, or should be loved. should be loved. 2. Thou mightst, couldst, 2. Ye or you might, could, wouldst, or shouldst be loved.

would, or should be loved...

3. He might, could, would, 3. They might, could, would, or should be loved.

or should be loved.

PERFECT TENSE.

-- SINGULAR.

PLURAL.

1. I may or can have been 1. We may or ean have been

loved.

loved.

2. Thou mayst or canst have 2. Ye or you may or can have been loved.

been loved.

3. He may or can have been 3. They may or can have been

[blocks in formation]

1. I might, could, would, or 1. We might, could, would, or should have been loved.

should have been loved.

2. Thou mightst, couldst, 2. Ye or you might, could, wouldst, or shouldst have

been loved.

would, or should have been loved.

3. He might, could, would or 3. They might, could, would, or

[blocks in formation]

The remaining tenses of this mood are, in general, similar to the correspondent tenses of the indicative mood See pages 90, 103, and the notes under the nineteenth rule of syntax.

« PreviousContinue »