Educating Judges: Towards a New Model of Continuing Judicial LearningThis volume provides the first comprehensive study of judicial education. Judicial education is new to the common law tradition of judging. During the past twenty years, the education of judges has become a matter of considerable prominence and debate in the United States, Britain, Canada and Australia, most recently prompted by media complaints of gender and racial bias. This work researches the underlying issues through a comparative analysis of experience across the common law world. The author explores the need for judicial education and how it should be provided. He argues that judicial education is a distinctive process, owing to the doctrine of judicial independence and a number of educational considerations. The work offers a model approach for educating judges and provides analysis, reasoned insights and practical assistance for judges and educators to guide future endeavour. With an introduction from Sir Anthony Mason, Chief Justice of Australia between 1987 and 1995. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Introduction | 3 |
The Need for Judicial Education | 23 |
Judicial Selection | 41 |
Assessment of Need | 67 |
Adult Learning | 105 |
Judges as Learners | 129 |
Frameworks of Policy and Practice | 155 |
Educational Evaluation | 183 |
Conclusions | 215 |
223 | |
233 | |
Common terms and phrases
accountability activities Administration Adult Education adult learning analysis application appointment approach appropriate argues assessment Australia behaviour Brookfield Catlin chapter characteristics common competence concept concern conducted considerations continuing education continuing judicial education court criteria critical defined described determine direct discussion distinctive doctrinal effective evaluation evidence example exist experience extent facilitation factors findings formalized goals Houle Hudzik identified impact important improve integrity issues Journal judges judicial independence judicial officers judiciary justice knowledge learners less mandatory means measure merit Michigan nature Needs Assessment objectives observed operating orientation outcomes participation particular performance planning practice preferred problem procedure professional professional education promote question rated reasons recent recognized reflect relating Report response role seen selection significant skills social South Wales specific standards theory tion United University
Popular passages
Page 223 - Standing Committee on Federal Judiciary: What It Is and How It Works