Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 18, Part 3American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2000 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 77
Page 12
... material ( designated as M1 material ) is about 50 % higher than that of the lower strength material ( designated as M3 material ) . It should be noted that the M3 material exhibits Lüders strain of a length about 0.8 % . In the M1 ...
... material ( designated as M1 material ) is about 50 % higher than that of the lower strength material ( designated as M3 material ) . It should be noted that the M3 material exhibits Lüders strain of a length about 0.8 % . In the M1 ...
Page 23
... material differ in more than 10 % . The increased complexity of this formulation does not affect the hierarchisation criteria presented above . Thus , the second hierarchical stage covered by the procedure , which should be chosen once ...
... material differ in more than 10 % . The increased complexity of this formulation does not affect the hierarchisation criteria presented above . Thus , the second hierarchical stage covered by the procedure , which should be chosen once ...
Page 207
... material selection in the DUCT application is the fatigue capacity of the fiber materials together with the matrix material . In general , the higher the elastic modulus of the fiber the better the fatigue capacity . Based on this , a ...
... material selection in the DUCT application is the fatigue capacity of the fiber materials together with the matrix material . In general , the higher the elastic modulus of the fiber the better the fatigue capacity . Based on this , a ...
Contents
STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY PROCEDURES FOR EUROPE SINTAP | 1 |
OMAE99MAT2041 | 9 |
Development of the SINTAP Failure Assessment Diagrams for Compatibility With | 19 |
Copyright | |
28 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
addition analysis applications approach ASME assessment base behavior bending CGHAZ Charpy compared component composite condition Conference Copyright crack critical CTOD curve defects deposition depth determined developed distribution dynamic effect element energy Engineering equations equivalent evaluated factors failure fatigue ferrite Figure fire fracture toughness function geometry given hardness heat input impact important improve increase initiation International joints length limit loading lower material matrix maximum mean measured mechanical method microstructure molten observed obtained offshore operating parameters performance phase pipe plate prediction present pressure procedure production properties protection range ratio reduced region requirements residual stress respectively risers safety ship shown shows specimens standards steel strain strength structures surface Table temperature tensile thickness values weld metal welded joints wire yield