The Decline of the West: Perspectives of World-History

Front Cover
Arktos Media Limited, 2021 - History - 682 pages

In the second and more controversial, albeit optimistic, volume of The Decline of the West, Oswald Spengler deals with the world historical perspectives of his comparative cultural morphology. The periodical calm surrounding the constant and eternally recurring movements, described in the first volume, is over. Spengler develops his theory of "Caesarism" - a tendency towards dictatorship peculiar to mass democracy.

According to Spengler, today we live in the decadent stage of civilization. Previously, the people of culture used money for buying and selling while their main thoughts and occupations lay elsewhere. The people of civilization, however, exclusively think in terms of money and nothing else. That is why our period is also marked by rapacious oligarchs, cunning stock market manipulation, a flourishing art trade and boundless corruption. Only the return of the eternal values of blood and race, through the coming of the Caesars, can destroy the tyranny of the financial mind. Thus Caesarism will bring the victory of strength politics over capital, breaking the pecuniary power and promoting national welfare.

The scene is set for the final battle between the forces of plutocracy and chaos and the political will and order of the Caesars.

Other editions - View all

About the author (2021)

Oswald Spengler (1880-1936) was one of the most significant and at the same time most controversial philosophers and historians of the 20th century. Already as a teenager, he filled entire notebooks with elaborate visions of two fictional empires, his sketches including administrative minutiae, descriptions of geographical features and economic statistics. Much later, through the publication of The Decline of the West, he became world-famous and the subject of intense debates and controversies. Thus the bachelor Spengler was financially independent at last and able to mingle with illustrious and influential figures from society. With his culture-specific approach regarding religion, art, science and tradition, he was a forerunner of modern sociobiology and evolutionary anthropology. He is also known as an anti-democratic political writer and considered part of the nationalist Conservative Revolution. However, he rejected National Socialism, especially the racial supremacism, and refused to collaborate with its regime.

Bibliographic information