Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 48
Page 95
point B point A point C center - section Fig.4 Bending stress in FBSP model Table 1 1/1000 expected value of stress ... ( 1st - order amplitude ) : Experiment ( peak value ) O : FEA 6.0 0.40 5.0 Bending Stress ( MPa ) 0.30 Bending Stress ...
point B point A point C center - section Fig.4 Bending stress in FBSP model Table 1 1/1000 expected value of stress ... ( 1st - order amplitude ) : Experiment ( peak value ) O : FEA 6.0 0.40 5.0 Bending Stress ( MPa ) 0.30 Bending Stress ...
Page 165
The generalized coordinate for mode 7 , vertical bending , is very large at this frequency . Additional calculations show that the MOB has a wet natural period of 3.1 sec . Resonance leads to unrealistically large response , with a ...
The generalized coordinate for mode 7 , vertical bending , is very large at this frequency . Additional calculations show that the MOB has a wet natural period of 3.1 sec . Resonance leads to unrealistically large response , with a ...
Page 315
Х 3.0E + 07 14 sec 18sec A 10sec E 2.0E + 07 у 25 sec www 1m 4.96 * 10 * Nm2 / m 8sec 1,700m 1.0E + 07 Draft Bending Rigidity Water Depth 5m 0.0E + 00 0 30 60 90 Wave Direction ( deg . ) Figure 6. Maximum bending moment 150m Figure 3.
Х 3.0E + 07 14 sec 18sec A 10sec E 2.0E + 07 у 25 sec www 1m 4.96 * 10 * Nm2 / m 8sec 1,700m 1.0E + 07 Draft Bending Rigidity Water Depth 5m 0.0E + 00 0 30 60 90 Wave Direction ( deg . ) Figure 6. Maximum bending moment 150m Figure 3.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
OMAE2001OSU5019 | 93 |
OMAE2001OSU5021 | 101 |
OMAE2001OSU5022 | 111 |
Copyright | |
32 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis angle applied arrangement assumed beam bending body bottom breakwater bridge calculated chamber coefficient compared components concept Conference considered construction deformation depth described developed device direction displacement distribution dynamic effect elastic element Engineering equation evaluate experiment experimental field Figure floating structure flow force frequency function girder horizontal hydrodynamic hydroelastic increase International irregular waves Japan layer length linear load maneuvers mass mean measured Mega-Float method mode modules mooring motion observed obtained ocean Offshore operation performance position predicted present pressure problem Proceedings ratio reduce reef region Research respectively response rigid scale ship shown shows side significant simulation spectrum submerged plate surface Table Tokyo turbine University vertical VLFS wave energy wave height wave period wind