Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 - Arctic regions |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 66
Page 71
0 -200 400 -600 -800 -1000 -1200 -1400 -1600 0 Table 6 Wind drag force Wind Direction ( deg . ] F , wind ( tonf ] F , wind ( tonf ] M , wind ( tonf • m ] 180 -1904 0 210 -2943 -2302 20999 240 -1560 4888 -44965 270 0 4797 0 - VODAC техр ...
0 -200 400 -600 -800 -1000 -1200 -1400 -1600 0 Table 6 Wind drag force Wind Direction ( deg . ] F , wind ( tonf ] F , wind ( tonf ] M , wind ( tonf • m ] 180 -1904 0 210 -2943 -2302 20999 240 -1560 4888 -44965 270 0 4797 0 - VODAC техр ...
Page 213
43 ° N Edo River Ara and Naka River Tokyo Sumida River Makuhari Chiba N As for the open boundary conditions , identical values in the horizontal direction and different values in the vertical direction are given to consider the effect ...
43 ° N Edo River Ara and Naka River Tokyo Sumida River Makuhari Chiba N As for the open boundary conditions , identical values in the horizontal direction and different values in the vertical direction are given to consider the effect ...
Page 300
The number of panels for the floating structure is 84 in xdirection and 36 in y - direction , the number of panels of a breakwater is 100 each at Region I and I in x - direction and 5 in z - direction and the number of panels for ...
The number of panels for the floating structure is 84 in xdirection and 36 in y - direction , the number of panels of a breakwater is 100 each at Region I and I in x - direction and 5 in z - direction and the number of panels for ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
OMAE2001OSU5019 | 93 |
OMAE2001OSU5021 | 101 |
OMAE2001OSU5022 | 111 |
Copyright | |
32 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
amplitude analysis angle applied arrangement assumed beam bending body bottom breakwater bridge calculated chamber coefficient compared components concept Conference considered construction deformation depth described developed device direction displacement distribution dynamic effect elastic element Engineering equation evaluate experiment experimental field Figure floating structure flow force frequency function girder horizontal hydrodynamic hydroelastic increase International irregular waves Japan layer length linear load maneuvers mass mean measured Mega-Float method mode modules mooring motion observed obtained ocean Offshore operation performance position predicted present pressure problem Proceedings ratio reduce reef region Research respectively response rigid scale ship shown shows side significant simulation spectrum submerged plate surface Table Tokyo turbine University vertical VLFS wave energy wave height wave period wind